From: Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@panasas.com>
To: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
Cc: Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com, osd-dev@open-osd.org,
Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3 v3] osdblk: a Linux block device for OSD objects
Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 12:40:05 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <49F6CEF5.5090203@panasas.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090427182434.GD4593@kernel.dk>
On 04/27/2009 09:24 PM, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 27 2009, Boaz Harrosh wrote:
Jens Hi, Thanks for your reply. Please I need some help with
this.
>>> +static struct bio *bio_chain_clone(struct bio *old_chain, gfp_t gfpmask)
>>> +{
>>> + struct bio *tmp, *new_chain = NULL, *tail = NULL;
>>> +
>>> + while (old_chain) {
>>> + tmp = bio_clone(old_chain, gfpmask);
>>> + if (!tmp)
>>> + goto err_out;
>>> +
>>> + tmp->bi_next = NULL;
>>> + if (!new_chain)
>>> + new_chain = tail = tmp;
>>> + else {
>>> + tail->bi_next = tmp;
>>> + tail = tmp;
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + old_chain = old_chain->bi_next;
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + return new_chain;
>>> +
>>> +err_out:
>>> + bio_chain_put(new_chain);
>>> + return NULL;
>>> +}
>>> +
>> NOTE-TO-ME:
>> blk_bio_clone()
>
> Note to Boaz - this is illegal, unless gfp_mask is GFP_ATOMIC (in which
> case you should not pass it in).
OK it is only used with GFP_ATOMIC.
Theoretically, what if I use a thread and am aloud to sleep,
(and executing requests in serial). Can I then wait on the first bio_clone.
> The only way to make this work is to:
>
Are you saying that, in the case I'm a swap device? or do you mean that if I
use the above code I can break it for other devices that are swap-devices
and cause a live lock for them.
Currently the OSD library is not swap safe. And even if it was, iSCSI is not.
So there is no option of this ever been swap.
> 1) Have a private bio pool, and
Do I need to manage such a pool internally and use __bio_clone() or is there
an easy way to associate a private bio-pool to a request_queue?
> 2) Make sure it has enough reserved entries to populate the chain
Is there a system limit to that, that I can be sure of? Or just choose
a magic number and if it is exceeded just split the io up in parts?
> 3) Ensure only a single caller at the time, or entries enough for the N
> users that are allowed. It has to be controlled either way, whether N
> is 1 or larger.
osdblk_rq_fn (the queue fn) is it serialized to one thread? If not
could I use the queue lock for the duration of the clone?
>
Thanks for your help
Boaz
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-04-28 9:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-04-02 1:54 [PATCH] osdblk: a Linux block device for OSD objects Jeff Garzik
2009-04-02 2:05 ` Jeff Garzik
2009-04-02 12:26 ` Boaz Harrosh
2009-04-02 16:46 ` Jeff Garzik
2009-04-03 9:38 ` Jeff Garzik
2009-04-05 10:22 ` Boaz Harrosh
2009-04-03 1:32 ` James Bottomley
2009-04-03 10:14 ` Jeff Garzik
2009-04-03 9:49 ` Jens Axboe
2009-04-03 9:58 ` Jeff Garzik
2009-04-05 10:18 ` Boaz Harrosh
2009-04-08 1:29 ` Jeff Garzik
2009-04-08 5:45 ` Jens Axboe
2009-04-08 6:02 ` Jeff Garzik
2009-04-08 6:08 ` Jens Axboe
2009-04-07 7:26 ` Pavel Machek
2009-04-07 22:53 ` [PATCH v2] " Jeff Garzik
2009-04-10 11:48 ` [PATCH 1/3] block/blk-map.c: blk_rq_append_bio should ensure it's not appending a chain Jeff Garzik
2009-04-10 11:49 ` [PATCH 2/3] osd_initiator: support bio chains Jeff Garzik
2009-04-10 11:50 ` [PATCH 3/3 v3] osdblk: a Linux block device for OSD objects Jeff Garzik
2009-04-27 15:59 ` Boaz Harrosh
2009-04-27 18:24 ` Jens Axboe
2009-04-28 9:40 ` Boaz Harrosh [this message]
2009-04-27 16:02 ` [PATCH 2/3] osd_initiator: support bio chains Boaz Harrosh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=49F6CEF5.5090203@panasas.com \
--to=bharrosh@panasas.com \
--cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=jeff@garzik.org \
--cc=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=osd-dev@open-osd.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).