From: ib@wupperonline.de (Ingo Brueckl)
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] unnecessary SCSI module
Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2009 08:00:00 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <49b60f4c@wupperonline.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1236633029.6029.1.camel@localhost.localdomain>
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com> writes:
>> When configuring MODULES with the kernel to be able to load external
>> drivers coming as modules, but not using anything as module in the kernel
>> itself, one would expect to end up in a module-free kernel. Currently, you
>> don't if you use SCSI. You'll get one unnecessary module.
> This isn't right because SCSI_SCAN_ASYNC only sets the *default*
> behaviour of the kernel. Even if it's n the user can still boot up with
> async scans by setting the kernel parameter.
Ok, understood. But has it to be a module then? Why not giving the choice
between building it directly into the kernel or as a module?
> It also keeps coming up regularly:
Well, then something doesn't seem to be ok, does it? ;-)
Ingo
Signed-off-by: Ingo Brueckl <ib@wupperonline.de>
--- linux-2.6.28/drivers/scsi/Kconfig.orig 2008-12-25 00:26:37.000000000 +0100
+++ linux-2.6.28/drivers/scsi/Kconfig 2009-03-10 08:11:38.000000000 +0100
@@ -257,10 +257,14 @@ config SCSI_SCAN_ASYNC
or async on the kernel's command line.
config SCSI_WAIT_SCAN
- tristate
- default m
+ tristate "SCSI wait scanning"
depends on SCSI
depends on MODULES
+ help
+ If you are using a SCSI module and do asynchronous SCSI scanning
+ (either by having selected SCSI_SCAN_ASYNC or by specifying
+ "scsi_mod.scan=async" on the kernel's command line), you MUST say Y
+ here.
menu "SCSI Transports"
depends on SCSI
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-03-10 7:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-03-09 19:06 [PATCH] unnecessary SCSI module Ingo Brueckl
2009-03-09 21:10 ` James Bottomley
2009-03-10 7:00 ` Ingo Brueckl [this message]
2009-03-10 14:46 ` James Bottomley
2009-03-10 17:24 ` Stefan Richter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=49b60f4c@wupperonline.de \
--to=ib@wupperonline.de \
--cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox