public inbox for linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
To: Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
	"Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>,
	"James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 04/17] scsi: core: Call .eh_prepare_resubmit() before resubmitting
Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2023 07:26:04 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <49bdae64-6162-5802-2dfb-c433ab48b5f9@acm.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201ae2be-3829-97ad-caa5-6f6f3a41e6db@kernel.org>

On 8/17/23 04:10, Damien Le Moal wrote:
> On 8/17/23 04:53, Bart Van Assche wrote:
>> +/*
>> + * Returns true if the commands in @done_q should be sorted in LBA order
>> + * before being resubmitted.
>> + */
>> +static bool scsi_needs_sorting(struct list_head *done_q)
>> +{
>> +	struct scsi_cmnd *scmd;
>> +
>> +	list_for_each_entry(scmd, done_q, eh_entry) {
>> +		struct request *rq = scsi_cmd_to_rq(scmd);
>> +
>> +		if (!rq->q->limits.use_zone_write_lock &&
>> +		    blk_rq_is_seq_zoned_write(rq))
>> +			return true;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	return false;
>> +}
>> +
>> +/*
>> + * Comparison function that allows to sort SCSI commands by ULD driver.
>> + */
>> +static int scsi_cmp_uld(void *priv, const struct list_head *_a,
>> +			const struct list_head *_b)
>> +{
>> +	struct scsi_cmnd *a = list_entry(_a, typeof(*a), eh_entry);
>> +	struct scsi_cmnd *b = list_entry(_b, typeof(*b), eh_entry);
>> +
>> +	/* See also the comment above the list_sort() definition. */
>> +	return scsi_cmd_to_driver(a) > scsi_cmd_to_driver(b);
>> +}
>> +
>> +void scsi_call_prepare_resubmit(struct list_head *done_q)
>> +{
>> +	struct scsi_cmnd *scmd, *next;
>> +
>> +	if (!scsi_needs_sorting(done_q))
>> +		return;
> 
> This is strange. The eh_prepare_resubmit callback is generic and its name does
> not indicate anything related to sorting by LBAs. So this check would prevent
> other actions not related to sorting by LBA. This should go away.
> 
> In patch 6, based on the device characteristics, the sd driver should decides
> if it needs to set .eh_prepare_resubmit or not.
> 
> And ideally, if all ULDs have eh_prepare_resubmit == NULL, this function should
> return here before going through the list of commands to resubmit. Given that
> this list should generally be small, going through it and doing nothing should
> be OK though...

I can add a eh_prepare_resubmit == NULL check early in 
scsi_call_prepare_resubmit(). Regarding the code inside 
scsi_needs_sorting(), how about moving that code into an additional 
callback function, e.g. eh_needs_prepare_resubmit? Setting 
.eh_prepare_resubmit depending on the zone model would prevent 
constification of struct scsi_driver.

Thanks,

Bart.

  reply	other threads:[~2023-08-17 14:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-08-16 19:53 [PATCH v9 00/17] Improve performance for zoned UFS devices Bart Van Assche
2023-08-16 19:53 ` [PATCH v9 01/17] block: Introduce more member variables related to zone write locking Bart Van Assche
2023-08-17 11:00   ` Damien Le Moal
2023-08-16 19:53 ` [PATCH v9 02/17] block: Only use write locking if necessary Bart Van Assche
2023-08-17 11:01   ` Damien Le Moal
2023-08-17 14:21     ` Bart Van Assche
2023-08-16 19:53 ` [PATCH v9 03/17] block/mq-deadline: Only use zone " Bart Van Assche
2023-08-17 11:02   ` Damien Le Moal
2023-08-16 19:53 ` [PATCH v9 04/17] scsi: core: Call .eh_prepare_resubmit() before resubmitting Bart Van Assche
2023-08-17 11:10   ` Damien Le Moal
2023-08-17 14:26     ` Bart Van Assche [this message]
2023-08-18  2:38       ` Damien Le Moal
2023-08-16 19:53 ` [PATCH v9 05/17] scsi: core: Add unit tests for scsi_call_prepare_resubmit() Bart Van Assche
2023-08-16 19:53 ` [PATCH v9 06/17] scsi: sd: Sort commands by LBA before resubmitting Bart Van Assche
2023-08-17 11:13   ` Damien Le Moal
2023-08-17 14:34     ` Bart Van Assche
2023-08-18  2:41       ` Damien Le Moal
2023-08-16 19:53 ` [PATCH v9 07/17] scsi: core: Retry unaligned zoned writes Bart Van Assche
2023-08-17 11:21   ` Damien Le Moal
2023-08-16 19:53 ` [PATCH v9 08/17] scsi: sd_zbc: Only require an I/O scheduler if needed Bart Van Assche
2023-08-17 11:21   ` Damien Le Moal
2023-08-16 19:53 ` [PATCH v9 09/17] scsi: scsi_debug: Support disabling zone write locking Bart Van Assche
2023-08-17 11:25   ` Damien Le Moal
2023-08-17 14:35     ` Bart Van Assche
2023-08-16 19:53 ` [PATCH v9 10/17] scsi: scsi_debug: Support injecting unaligned write errors Bart Van Assche
2023-08-17 11:29   ` Damien Le Moal
2023-08-16 19:53 ` [PATCH v9 11/17] scsi: ufs: hisi: Rework the code that disables auto-hibernation Bart Van Assche
2023-08-16 19:53 ` [PATCH v9 12/17] scsi: ufs: mediatek: Rework the code for disabling auto-hibernation Bart Van Assche
2023-08-17 18:40   ` Bao D. Nguyen
2023-08-17 19:13     ` Bart Van Assche
2023-08-16 19:53 ` [PATCH v9 13/17] scsi: ufs: sprd: " Bart Van Assche
2023-08-16 19:53 ` [PATCH v9 14/17] scsi: ufs: Rename ufshcd_auto_hibern8_enable() and make it static Bart Van Assche
2023-08-17 18:49   ` Bao D. Nguyen
2023-08-17 19:16     ` Bart Van Assche
2023-08-17 21:48       ` Bao D. Nguyen
2023-08-16 19:53 ` [PATCH v9 15/17] scsi: ufs: Simplify ufshcd_auto_hibern8_update() Bart Van Assche
2023-08-16 19:53 ` [PATCH v9 16/17] scsi: ufs: Forbid auto-hibernation without I/O scheduler Bart Van Assche
2023-08-17 18:50   ` Bao D. Nguyen
2023-08-17 19:18     ` Bart Van Assche
2023-08-16 19:53 ` [PATCH v9 17/17] scsi: ufs: Inform the block layer about write ordering Bart Van Assche
2023-08-17 19:00   ` Bao D. Nguyen
2023-08-17 19:34     ` Bart Van Assche
2023-08-17 21:47       ` Bao D. Nguyen
2023-08-17 22:05         ` Bart Van Assche
2023-08-18  0:19           ` Bao D. Nguyen
2023-08-18 17:56             ` Bart Van Assche

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=49bdae64-6162-5802-2dfb-c433ab48b5f9@acm.org \
    --to=bvanassche@acm.org \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=dlemoal@kernel.org \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=jejb@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
    --cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox