linux-scsi.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@panasas.com>
To: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp>,
	jens.axboe@oracle.com, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com,
	linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] block: completion related functions cleanup
Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 16:54:31 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A0C2297.5040001@panasas.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1242032169-22422-1-git-send-email-fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp>

On 05/11/2009 11:56 AM, FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
> This is a minor cleanup on the completion releated functions. It is on
> the top of Tejun's unify request processing model patchset.
> 
> 

Hi Tomo, Jens, Tejun.

A small left-over from this grate cleanup work. I think it was Tejun's
patch that left this unused.

(Should go through block tree)

Here:
---
From: Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@panasas.com>
Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 16:46:03 +0300
Subject: [PATCH] scsi_lib: remove unused variable assignment

The last request completion cleanup in scsi_lib left an unused
this_count assignment in scsi_io_completion().
(It was used before in a code segment that now uses blk_end_request_all())

Signed-off-by: Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@panasas.com>
---
 drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c |    1 -
 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
index e410d66..f8600d6 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
@@ -789,7 +789,6 @@ void scsi_io_completion(struct scsi_cmnd *cmd, unsigned int good_bytes)
 	 */
 	if (scsi_end_request(cmd, error, good_bytes, result == 0) == NULL)
 		return;
-	this_count = blk_rq_bytes(req);
 
 	error = -EIO;
 
-- 
1.6.2.1

  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-05-14 13:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-05-11  8:56 [PATCH 0/3] block: completion releated functions cleanup FUJITA Tomonori
2009-05-11  8:56 ` [PATCH 1/3] block: let blk_end_request_all handle bidi requests FUJITA Tomonori
2009-05-11  9:06   ` Jens Axboe
2009-05-11  9:11     ` FUJITA Tomonori
2009-05-11  9:16       ` Jens Axboe
2009-05-11  8:56 ` [PATCH 2/3] scsi: simplify the bidi completion FUJITA Tomonori
2009-05-11  8:56 ` [PATCH 3/3] block: move completion related functions back to blk-core.c FUJITA Tomonori
2009-05-11  9:06 ` [PATCH 0/3] block: completion releated functions cleanup Jens Axboe
2009-05-14 13:54 ` Boaz Harrosh [this message]
2009-05-14 14:05   ` [PATCH 0/3] block: completion related " Tejun Heo
2009-05-14 14:15     ` Boaz Harrosh
2009-05-14 15:46       ` Tejun Heo
2009-05-15  0:12       ` FUJITA Tomonori

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4A0C2297.5040001@panasas.com \
    --to=bharrosh@panasas.com \
    --cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com \
    --cc=fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp \
    --cc=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).