From: Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@panasas.com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
James Smart <James.Smart@Emulex.Com>,
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
linux-scsi <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
FUJITA Tomonori <tomof@acm.org>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Jens Axboe <Jens.Axboe@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH version 2] [SQUASHME] "FC Pass Thru support" fixed for block/for-2.6.31 tree
Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 11:11:09 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A13BB1D.10901@panasas.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090520111619.87f815b1.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
On 05/20/2009 04:16 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> On Tue, 19 May 2009 15:54:59 +0300 Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@panasas.com> wrote:
>>
>> This patch should be squashed into
>> [SCSI] FC Pass Thru support
>>
>> If it needs to compile after Tejun's block-layer revamps
>> (all of them)
>
> Is there some reason that the FC passthrough support (and any followup
> patches) can't be pushed through the block tree. It clearly currently
> doesn't depend on anything new in the scsi tree ...
>
If it will go through block tree it needs James Bottomley's Ack, I
guess?
It does, in any case, need Ack from James Smart first. James ?
Thanks
Boaz
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-05-20 8:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-05-19 9:18 [PATCH] [SQUASHME] "FC Pass Thru support" fixed for block/for-2.6.31 tree Boaz Harrosh
2009-05-19 10:05 ` Tejun Heo
2009-05-19 10:14 ` Boaz Harrosh
2009-05-19 12:54 ` [PATCH version 2] " Boaz Harrosh
2009-05-20 1:16 ` Stephen Rothwell
2009-05-20 8:11 ` Boaz Harrosh [this message]
2009-05-20 12:54 ` James Smart
2009-05-20 14:37 ` James Bottomley
2009-05-20 14:42 ` Stephen Rothwell
2009-05-20 14:47 ` James Bottomley
2009-05-20 16:20 ` James Bottomley
2009-05-20 16:39 ` Boaz Harrosh
2009-05-20 16:40 ` Boaz Harrosh
2009-05-20 16:43 ` James Bottomley
2009-05-20 16:59 ` Boaz Harrosh
2009-05-20 17:03 ` Boaz Harrosh
2009-05-20 17:11 ` James Bottomley
2009-05-20 14:45 ` Stephen Rothwell
2009-05-20 19:10 ` Jens Axboe
2009-05-20 4:16 ` Stephen Rothwell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4A13BB1D.10901@panasas.com \
--to=bharrosh@panasas.com \
--cc=James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
--cc=James.Smart@Emulex.Com \
--cc=Jens.Axboe@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=tomof@acm.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).