From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Boaz Harrosh Subject: Re: [PATCH version 2] [SQUASHME] "FC Pass Thru support" fixed for block/for-2.6.31 tree Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 11:11:09 +0300 Message-ID: <4A13BB1D.10901@panasas.com> References: <4A12797B.2060901@panasas.com> <4A12AC23.30808@panasas.com> <20090520111619.87f815b1.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from yx-out-2324.google.com ([74.125.44.30]:57212 "EHLO yx-out-2324.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752629AbZETILR (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 May 2009 04:11:17 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20090520111619.87f815b1.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: Stephen Rothwell , James Smart , James Bottomley Cc: Tejun Heo , linux-scsi , FUJITA Tomonori , Linux Kernel , Jens Axboe On 05/20/2009 04:16 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > On Tue, 19 May 2009 15:54:59 +0300 Boaz Harrosh wrote: >> >> This patch should be squashed into >> [SCSI] FC Pass Thru support >> >> If it needs to compile after Tejun's block-layer revamps >> (all of them) > > Is there some reason that the FC passthrough support (and any followup > patches) can't be pushed through the block tree. It clearly currently > doesn't depend on anything new in the scsi tree ... > If it will go through block tree it needs James Bottomley's Ack, I guess? It does, in any case, need Ack from James Smart first. James ? Thanks Boaz