From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: James Smart Subject: Re: [PATCH version 2] [SQUASHME] "FC Pass Thru support" fixed for block/for-2.6.31 tree Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 08:54:13 -0400 Message-ID: <4A13FD75.6050100@emulex.com> References: <4A12797B.2060901@panasas.com> <4A12AC23.30808@panasas.com> <20090520111619.87f815b1.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <4A13BB1D.10901@panasas.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <4A13BB1D.10901@panasas.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Boaz Harrosh Cc: Stephen Rothwell , James Bottomley , Tejun Heo , linux-scsi , FUJITA Tomonori , Linux Kernel , Jens Axboe List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org Fine by me. -- james s Acked-by: James Smart Boaz Harrosh wrote: > On 05/20/2009 04:16 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > >> On Tue, 19 May 2009 15:54:59 +0300 Boaz Harrosh wrote: >> >>> This patch should be squashed into >>> [SCSI] FC Pass Thru support >>> >>> If it needs to compile after Tejun's block-layer revamps >>> (all of them) >>> >> Is there some reason that the FC passthrough support (and any followup >> patches) can't be pushed through the block tree. It clearly currently >> doesn't depend on anything new in the scsi tree ... >> >> > > If it will go through block tree it needs James Bottomley's Ack, I > guess? > > It does, in any case, need Ack from James Smart first. James ? > > Thanks > Boaz > >