From: Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@panasas.com>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, James Smart <James.Smart@Emulex.Com>,
linux-scsi <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
FUJITA Tomonori <tomof@acm.org>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Jens Axboe <Jens.Axboe@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH version 2] [SQUASHME] "FC Pass Thru support" fixed for block/for-2.6.31 tree
Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 19:40:35 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A143283.5000104@panasas.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4A14322A.4000709@panasas.com>
On 05/20/2009 07:39 PM, Boaz Harrosh wrote:
> On 05/20/2009 07:20 PM, James Bottomley wrote:
>> On Wed, 2009-05-20 at 14:47 +0000, James Bottomley wrote:
>>> OK, so I think your pulling of my posmerge tree can cope with the fact
>>> that I did the necessary rebasing in block for-next before I made it the
>>> base of my combined tree .... think of this as a nice test.
>>>
>>> Just building now ... if it works, I'll push to SCSI post merge and all
>>> our problems should go away.
>> Unfortunately the combined tree hits a BUG_ON blk-core.c:2045 when doing
>> SPI domain validation.
>>
>> There will be a short delay ...
>>
>> James
>>
>>
>
> I have rebased block/for-next onto linus/master which should give us the
> same content?
>
> But line 2045 is on a code comment.
>
> if I now do a git-log v2.6.30-rc3..HEAD I have the following patches:
for blk-core.c that is
> pick 42dad76 block: simplify I/O stat accounting
> pick af498d7 block: fix the bio_vec array index out-of-bounds test
> pick d616ee5 block: clear req->errors on bio completion only for fs requests
> pick 268ea3d block: merge blk_invoke_request_fn() into __blk_run_queue()
> pick d097b7d block: kill blk_start_queueing()
> pick 3099167 block: don't set REQ_NOMERGE unnecessarily
> pick 4095018 block: cleanup REQ_SOFTBARRIER usages
> pick 17fc349 block: reorder request completion functions
> pick 6e6732a block: reorganize request fetching functions
> pick ca219b4 block: kill blk_end_request_callback()
> pick ea1e706 block: clean up request completion API
> pick 70a8607 block: move rq->start_time initialization to blk_rq_init()
> pick fa6e42b block: implement and use [__]blk_end_request_all()
> pick 861af79 block: kill rq->data
> pick 6abeea3 block: make blk_do_io_stat() do the full "is this rq accountable" checks
> pick 2f94129 block: catch trying to use more bits than request->cmd_flags has
> pick 325f440 block: implement blk_rq_pos/[cur_]sectors() and convert obvious ones
> pick 7168ea4 block: convert to pos and nr_sectors accessors
> pick 209e1e4 block: drop request->hard_* and *nr_sectors
> pick 80d23d0 block: hide request sector and data_len
> pick 563e977 block: implement and enforce request peek/start/fetch
> pick 6cd0982 block: move completion related functions back to blk-core.c
> pick 3978c4e block: set rq->resid_len to blk_rq_bytes() on issue
> pick 01f54fd block: Add blk_make_request(), takes bio, returns a request
> pick 0d58792 block: add warning to blk_make_request()
>
> How did you resolve the block/for-next and linus/master merge?
>
> Thanks
> Boaz
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-05-20 16:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-05-19 9:18 [PATCH] [SQUASHME] "FC Pass Thru support" fixed for block/for-2.6.31 tree Boaz Harrosh
2009-05-19 10:05 ` Tejun Heo
2009-05-19 10:14 ` Boaz Harrosh
2009-05-19 12:54 ` [PATCH version 2] " Boaz Harrosh
2009-05-20 1:16 ` Stephen Rothwell
2009-05-20 8:11 ` Boaz Harrosh
2009-05-20 12:54 ` James Smart
2009-05-20 14:37 ` James Bottomley
2009-05-20 14:42 ` Stephen Rothwell
2009-05-20 14:47 ` James Bottomley
2009-05-20 16:20 ` James Bottomley
2009-05-20 16:39 ` Boaz Harrosh
2009-05-20 16:40 ` Boaz Harrosh [this message]
2009-05-20 16:43 ` James Bottomley
2009-05-20 16:59 ` Boaz Harrosh
2009-05-20 17:03 ` Boaz Harrosh
2009-05-20 17:11 ` James Bottomley
2009-05-20 14:45 ` Stephen Rothwell
2009-05-20 19:10 ` Jens Axboe
2009-05-20 4:16 ` Stephen Rothwell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4A143283.5000104@panasas.com \
--to=bharrosh@panasas.com \
--cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com \
--cc=James.Smart@Emulex.Com \
--cc=Jens.Axboe@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=tomof@acm.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).