From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tejun Heo Subject: Re: [PATCH v2]: New implementation of scsi_execute_async() Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2009 16:54:32 +0900 Message-ID: <4A5EDCB8.1010003@kernel.org> References: <4A563368.5040407@vlnb.net> <4A5CAFB5.1000901@vlnb.net> <4A5D9C46.2000002@panasas.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from hera.kernel.org ([140.211.167.34]:34261 "EHLO hera.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751299AbZGPHyw (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Jul 2009 03:54:52 -0400 In-Reply-To: <4A5D9C46.2000002@panasas.com> Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: Boaz Harrosh Cc: Vladislav Bolkhovitin , linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, scst-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, James Bottomley , FUJITA Tomonori , Jens Axboe , Joe Eykholt Hello, Boaz. Boaz Harrosh wrote: > It looks to me that perhaps you did not understand Tejun's code > His code, as I remember, was on the bio level, but here you > are duplicating what is done in bio level. I think he looked at my mess :-) and decided it would be cleaner to implement kernel sg mapping completely separately from user mapping. Maybe it is, I'm not sure. I sure hope not tho. Thanks. -- tejun