* Re: LSISAS1068E + WDC WD2002FYPS: I/O error & Sense Key [not found] ` <20090729200714.GA20706@lifeintegrity.com> @ 2009-07-29 23:04 ` Robert Hancock 2009-07-31 18:40 ` Allan Wind 0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: Robert Hancock @ 2009-07-29 23:04 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-ide; +Cc: linux-scsi On 07/29/2009 02:07 PM, Allan Wind wrote: > On 2009-07-29T13:43:06, Robert Hancock wrote: >> On 07/27/2009 12:03 AM, Allan Wind wrote: >>> I have a pair of Western Digital RE4-GP (WD2002FYPS) in RAID1 configuration >>> using Linux 2.6.30.3 and seeing the following: >>> >>> [ 4907.485324] end_request: I/O error, dev sdb, sector 3907028974 >> Are there no error messages before this point? Can you post the full >> dmesg output from bootup? > > Thanks for looking into this, Robert. I do not see any relevant error > message before this point, but made the entire 82k dmesg available here: > http://lifeintegrity.com/~allan/dmesg It seems like some request failed but apparently that mptsas driver isn't dumping out what happened for some reason. There are some of those "recovered error" indications but they're not near the I/O error report, so I'm not sure what's going on. CCing linux-scsi. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: LSISAS1068E + WDC WD2002FYPS: I/O error & Sense Key 2009-07-29 23:04 ` LSISAS1068E + WDC WD2002FYPS: I/O error & Sense Key Robert Hancock @ 2009-07-31 18:40 ` Allan Wind 2009-08-03 5:08 ` Allan Wind 0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: Allan Wind @ 2009-07-31 18:40 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-ide, linux-scsi On 2009-07-29T17:04:27, Robert Hancock wrote: > On 07/29/2009 02:07 PM, Allan Wind wrote: >> On 2009-07-29T13:43:06, Robert Hancock wrote: >>> On 07/27/2009 12:03 AM, Allan Wind wrote: >>>> I have a pair of Western Digital RE4-GP (WD2002FYPS) in RAID1 configuration >>>> using Linux 2.6.30.3 and seeing the following: >>>> >>>> [ 4907.485324] end_request: I/O error, dev sdb, sector 3907028974 >>> Are there no error messages before this point? Can you post the full >>> dmesg output from bootup? >> >> Thanks for looking into this, Robert. I do not see any relevant error >> message before this point, but made the entire 82k dmesg available here: >> http://lifeintegrity.com/~allan/dmesg > > It seems like some request failed but apparently that mptsas driver > isn't dumping out what happened for some reason. There are some of those > "recovered error" indications but they're not near the I/O error report, > so I'm not sure what's going on. CCing linux-scsi. Is there any data I can help with to advance this issue? /Allan -- Allan Wind Life Integrity, LLC <http://lifeintegrity.com> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: LSISAS1068E + WDC WD2002FYPS: I/O error & Sense Key 2009-07-31 18:40 ` Allan Wind @ 2009-08-03 5:08 ` Allan Wind 2009-08-03 14:34 ` James Bottomley 0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: Allan Wind @ 2009-08-03 5:08 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-ide, linux-scsi On 2009-07-31T14:40:23, Allan Wind wrote: > On 2009-07-29T17:04:27, Robert Hancock wrote: > > On 07/29/2009 02:07 PM, Allan Wind wrote: > >> On 2009-07-29T13:43:06, Robert Hancock wrote: > >>> On 07/27/2009 12:03 AM, Allan Wind wrote: > >>>> I have a pair of Western Digital RE4-GP (WD2002FYPS) in RAID1 configuration > >>>> using Linux 2.6.30.3 and seeing the following: > >>>> > >>>> [ 4907.485324] end_request: I/O error, dev sdb, sector 3907028974 > >>> Are there no error messages before this point? Can you post the full > >>> dmesg output from bootup? > >> > >> Thanks for looking into this, Robert. I do not see any relevant error > >> message before this point, but made the entire 82k dmesg available here: > >> http://lifeintegrity.com/~allan/dmesg > > > > It seems like some request failed but apparently that mptsas driver > > isn't dumping out what happened for some reason. There are some of those > > "recovered error" indications but they're not near the I/O error report, > > so I'm not sure what's going on. CCing linux-scsi. > > Is there any data I can help with to advance this issue? The above complains about sector 3907028974 which is exactly 19566 sectors greater than the size of the raid array according to parted. In other words it appears to be an access to the last sector of the array. Number Start End Size File system Name Flags 1 34s 19565s 19532s bios_grub 2 19566s 3907029134s 3907009569s ext3 raid Model: ATA WDC WD2002FYPS-0 (scsi) Disk /dev/sdb: 3907029168s Sector size (logical/physical): 512B/512B Partition Table: gpt Number Start End Size File system Name Flags 1 34s 19565s 19532s bios_grub 2 19566s 3907029134s 3907009569s ext3 raid Model: Unknown (unknown) Disk /dev/md0: 3907009408s Sector size (logical/physical): 512B/512B Partition Table: loop Number Start End Size File system Flags 1 0s 3907009407s 3907009408s ext3 # mdadm --detail /dev/md0 /dev/md0: Version : 0.90 Creation Time : Tue Jul 21 00:06:07 2009 Raid Level : raid1 Array Size : 1953504704 (1863.01 GiB 2000.39 GB) Used Dev Size : 1953504704 (1863.01 GiB 2000.39 GB) Raid Devices : 2 Total Devices : 2 Preferred Minor : 0 Persistence : Superblock is persistent Update Time : Mon Aug 3 00:59:07 2009 State : clean Active Devices : 2 Working Devices : 2 Failed Devices : 0 Spare Devices : 0 UUID : fdc1a639:0e6cf1a1:14ef9d30:0388f34d Events : 0.59706 Number Major Minor RaidDevice State 0 8 2 0 active sync /dev/sda2 1 8 18 1 active sync /dev/sdb2 Disabled NCQ did not work around this issue. /Allan -- Allan Wind Life Integrity, LLC <http://lifeintegrity.com> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: LSISAS1068E + WDC WD2002FYPS: I/O error & Sense Key 2009-08-03 5:08 ` Allan Wind @ 2009-08-03 14:34 ` James Bottomley 2009-08-03 16:06 ` Allan Wind 0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: James Bottomley @ 2009-08-03 14:34 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Allan Wind; +Cc: linux-ide, linux-scsi On Mon, 2009-08-03 at 01:08 -0400, Allan Wind wrote: > On 2009-07-31T14:40:23, Allan Wind wrote: > > On 2009-07-29T17:04:27, Robert Hancock wrote: > > > On 07/29/2009 02:07 PM, Allan Wind wrote: > > >> On 2009-07-29T13:43:06, Robert Hancock wrote: > > >>> On 07/27/2009 12:03 AM, Allan Wind wrote: > > >>>> I have a pair of Western Digital RE4-GP (WD2002FYPS) in RAID1 configuration > > >>>> using Linux 2.6.30.3 and seeing the following: > > >>>> > > >>>> [ 4907.485324] end_request: I/O error, dev sdb, sector 3907028974 > > >>> Are there no error messages before this point? Can you post the full > > >>> dmesg output from bootup? > > >> > > >> Thanks for looking into this, Robert. I do not see any relevant error > > >> message before this point, but made the entire 82k dmesg available here: > > >> http://lifeintegrity.com/~allan/dmesg > > > > > > It seems like some request failed but apparently that mptsas driver > > > isn't dumping out what happened for some reason. There are some of those > > > "recovered error" indications but they're not near the I/O error report, > > > so I'm not sure what's going on. CCing linux-scsi. > > > > Is there any data I can help with to advance this issue? > > The above complains about sector 3907028974 which is exactly > 19566 sectors greater than the size of the raid array according > to parted. In other words it appears to be an access to the last > sector of the array. If it's a read beyond the end of a partition, then it's possible it got rejected in the partition checking logic before ever reaching the I/O controller (which would explain why no messages from the fusion in the log). However, I don't think the analysis is correct. Parted says > Number Start End Size File system Name Flags > 1 34s 19565s 19532s bios_grub > 2 19566s 3907029134s 3907009569s ext3 raid So the absolute sector number 3907028974 is within partition 2. I still think something went wrong in block. Even if the fusion failed to spit an error, the SCSI layer is usually quite chatty about failures. To get a simple error in the log with no explanation usually tends to indicate that it occurred in the block layer. James ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: LSISAS1068E + WDC WD2002FYPS: I/O error & Sense Key 2009-08-03 14:34 ` James Bottomley @ 2009-08-03 16:06 ` Allan Wind 2009-08-03 16:15 ` James Bottomley 0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: Allan Wind @ 2009-08-03 16:06 UTC (permalink / raw) To: James Bottomley; +Cc: linux-ide, linux-scsi On 2009-08-03T09:34:53, James Bottomley wrote: > On Mon, 2009-08-03 at 01:08 -0400, Allan Wind wrote: > > > > The above complains about sector 3907028974 which is exactly > > 19566 sectors greater than the size of the raid array according > > to parted. In other words it appears to be an access to the last > > sector of the array. > > If it's a read beyond the end of a partition, then it's possible it got > rejected in the partition checking logic before ever reaching the I/O > controller (which would explain why no messages from the fusion in the > log). > > However, I don't think the analysis is correct. Parted says > > > > Number Start End Size File system Name Flags > > 1 34s 19565s 19532s bios_grub > > 2 19566s 3907029134s 3907009569s ext3 raid > > So the absolute sector number 3907028974 is within partition 2. I was actually trying to make a different point. Namely that it was curious that the error message complains about sector 3907028974 which is exactly the size of the array + 19566, or in other words 1 sector past the end of array: /dev/sdb2 start: 19566 end: 3907029134 size: 3907029134 - 19566 + 1 = 3907009568 /dev/md0 start: 0 end: 3907009407 size: 3907009407 - 0 + 1 = 3907009408 If dm maps linear to the disk sectors: dm /dev/sdb2 0 19566 1 19567 ... 3907009406 3907028972 3907009407 3907028973 What dm sector would map to physical sector 3907028974? /Allan -- Allan Wind Life Integrity, LLC <http://lifeintegrity.com> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: LSISAS1068E + WDC WD2002FYPS: I/O error & Sense Key 2009-08-03 16:06 ` Allan Wind @ 2009-08-03 16:15 ` James Bottomley 2009-08-26 21:17 ` Allan Wind 0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: James Bottomley @ 2009-08-03 16:15 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Allan Wind; +Cc: linux-ide, linux-scsi On Mon, 2009-08-03 at 12:06 -0400, Allan Wind wrote: > On 2009-08-03T09:34:53, James Bottomley wrote: > > On Mon, 2009-08-03 at 01:08 -0400, Allan Wind wrote: > > > > > > The above complains about sector 3907028974 which is exactly > > > 19566 sectors greater than the size of the raid array according > > > to parted. In other words it appears to be an access to the last > > > sector of the array. > > > > If it's a read beyond the end of a partition, then it's possible it got > > rejected in the partition checking logic before ever reaching the I/O > > controller (which would explain why no messages from the fusion in the > > log). > > > > However, I don't think the analysis is correct. Parted says > > > > > > > Number Start End Size File system Name Flags > > > 1 34s 19565s 19532s bios_grub > > > 2 19566s 3907029134s 3907009569s ext3 raid > > > > So the absolute sector number 3907028974 is within partition 2. > > I was actually trying to make a different point. Namely that it > was curious that the error message complains about sector > 3907028974 which is exactly the size of the array + 19566, or in > other words 1 sector past the end of array: That's where md stores its superblock ... but it's still within the partition. James ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: LSISAS1068E + WDC WD2002FYPS: I/O error & Sense Key 2009-08-03 16:15 ` James Bottomley @ 2009-08-26 21:17 ` Allan Wind 0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread From: Allan Wind @ 2009-08-26 21:17 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-ide, linux-scsi I have not seen any problems since upgrading to 2.6.30.4. /Allan -- Allan Wind Life Integrity, LLC <http://lifeintegrity.com> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2009-08-26 21:17 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <20090727060322.GB27002@lifeintegrity.com>
[not found] ` <4A70A64A.2070605@gmail.com>
[not found] ` <20090729200714.GA20706@lifeintegrity.com>
2009-07-29 23:04 ` LSISAS1068E + WDC WD2002FYPS: I/O error & Sense Key Robert Hancock
2009-07-31 18:40 ` Allan Wind
2009-08-03 5:08 ` Allan Wind
2009-08-03 14:34 ` James Bottomley
2009-08-03 16:06 ` Allan Wind
2009-08-03 16:15 ` James Bottomley
2009-08-26 21:17 ` Allan Wind
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox