From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mike Christie Subject: Re: qla2xxx: Conditionally disable automatic queue full tracking Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 14:49:22 -0500 Message-ID: <4ABBCD42.8050604@cs.wisc.edu> References: <5355D915-9CAE-41CD-846B-F816FE914E1B@qlogic.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from sabe.cs.wisc.edu ([128.105.6.20]:55675 "EHLO sabe.cs.wisc.edu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754105AbZIXTt3 (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Sep 2009 15:49:29 -0400 In-Reply-To: <5355D915-9CAE-41CD-846B-F816FE914E1B@qlogic.com> Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: Giridhar Malavali Cc: mdr@sgi.com, James Bottomley , LinuxSCSI , Andrew Vasquez , vasu.dev@intel.com Giridhar Malavali wrote: > Hi Michael/James, > > Patches were submitted to move queue ramp up/down code recently to > scsi mid layer. With this change, I don't see a need for a module > parameter to disable queuefull tracking in qla2xxx driver. Andrew, > mentioned that this got introduced to avoid wobbling behavior on the > wire due to queue depth modifications. Just wanted to check whether the > same need to be done in scsi mid layer too. > I think so. I believe Michael Reed had a valid reason for it, and I do not see why we would not hit a similar problem with other drivers.