From: Mike Christie <michaelc@cs.wisc.edu>
To: Christof Schmitt <christof.schmitt@de.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: fc_remote_port_delete and returning SCSI commands from LLD
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2009 16:53:50 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4AE76BEE.20907@cs.wisc.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20091023071324.GA5930@schmichrtp.de.ibm.com>
Christof Schmitt wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 01:11:15PM -0500, Mike Christie wrote:
>> Christof Schmitt wrote:
>>> If the remote_port status is not BLOCKED, this will trigger the SCSI
>>> midlayer error handling which cannot do much during the interruption
>>> to the hardware and will mark the SCSI devices 'offline'. In order to
>>> prevent this, the rule would be: First call fc_remote_port_delete to
>>> set the remote port (or in the case of an HBA interruption all remote
>>> ports) to BLOCKED, and only after this step call scsi_done to pass the
>>> SCSI commands back to the upper layers.
>>>
>> One other note when doing this.
>>
>> For problems where you are deleting the rport, it is best to use
>> something like DID_TRANSPORT_DISRUPTED to fail the cmd if you are
>> failing it right away.
>
> "something like DID_TRANSPORT_DISRUPTED" would be any error code that
> goes through "maybe_retry" in scsi_decide_disposition? I guess moving
> to DID_TRANSPORT_DISRUPTED is nice for consistency, but DID_ERROR
> triggers the same code paths as far as i can see.
It could be a little different. See scsi_noretry_cmd. If you used
DID_ERROR and something set the driver failfast bit then it would be
fast failed.
>
>> If drivers block the rport, then fail commands
>> immediately with DID_TRANSPORT_DISRUPTED, then they will not actually be
>> failed to the block/mpath layer until the fast io fail timeout has
>> fired. This will prevent very short problems from firing the mutlipath
>> path offlining code.
>
> Just to get the complete picture: Blocking the rport and then
> returning DID_TRANSPORT_DISRUPTED will retry the command to the LLD
> which then first calls fc_remote_port_chkready.
> fc_remote_port_chkready will then keep the command between LLD and
> SCSI midlayer until the rport state changes or the fast_fail fires.
> Is this the complete picture or did i miss something?
I think that is it.
>
>> If your driver deletes the rport and does not fail the cmd immediately
>> so it can recover within the command or some other reason like the fw
>> just works that way, then when the fast io fail timer fires and the
>> terminate_rport_io callback is run you could actually use any error code
>> since at this time when a IO is sent to the queuecommand the driver will
>> call fc_remote_port_chkready and IO will be failed immediately with
>> DID_TRANSPORT_FAILFAST).
>
> And the rport state is still BLOCKED, so at this point commands failed
> in the upper layers with blk_abort_request will not end up in the SCSI
> error recovery which cannot do much...
>
> Thanks for the help, i am starting to get the complete picture...
>
> Christof
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-10-27 21:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-10-20 14:40 fc_remote_port_delete and returning SCSI commands from LLD Christof Schmitt
2009-10-21 15:24 ` Christof Schmitt
2009-10-21 16:33 ` James Smart
2009-10-23 7:58 ` Christof Schmitt
2009-10-23 14:50 ` James Smart
2009-10-27 16:59 ` Christof Schmitt
2009-10-27 19:44 ` James Smart
2009-10-21 16:24 ` James Smart
2009-10-23 7:47 ` Christof Schmitt
2009-10-23 14:47 ` James Smart
2009-10-27 21:57 ` Mike Christie
2009-10-21 18:11 ` Mike Christie
2009-10-23 7:13 ` Christof Schmitt
2009-10-27 21:53 ` Mike Christie [this message]
2009-10-28 14:27 ` Christof Schmitt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4AE76BEE.20907@cs.wisc.edu \
--to=michaelc@cs.wisc.edu \
--cc=christof.schmitt@de.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox