From: Douglas Gilbert <dgilbert@interlog.com>
To: "Krzysztof Błaszkowski" <kb@sysmikro.com.pl>
Cc: eric@andante.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, Krzysztof.b@id-7.com
Subject: Re: does scsi_io_completion need to dump sense data for ata pass through (ck_cond = 1) ?
Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2009 14:44:01 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B312181.30000@interlog.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200912221917.36495.kb@sysmikro.com.pl>
Krzysztof Błaszkowski wrote:
> Hello Eric,
>
> I think it is not necessary and current behavior of kernel like 2.6.31
> confuses QA people.
> They need explanation that message like below:
>
> sd 5:0:1:0: [sdb] Sense Key : Recovered Error [current] [descriptor]
> Descriptor sense data with sense descriptors (in hex):
> 72 01 00 1d 00 00 00 0e 09 0c 00 00 00 00 00 00
> 00 00 00 00 00 50
> sd 5:0:1:0: [sdb] Add. Sense: ATA pass through information available
>
> stands for that sense data contains ata registers file and the command was
> executed properly.
>
> Here is additional condition i used in scsi_io_completion() which suppresses
> this message. Is it okay ?
Close but I would like to see a filter on the additional
sense code ATA PASS-THROUGH INFORMATION AVAILABLE [0x0, 0x1d].
There is nothing in SAT that precludes the return of a RECOVERED
ERROR sense code for a read on a SATA disk that was recovered
after some extra work (for example).
With that filter in place there is no need to filter on the command.
IOWs just filter on sense code RECOVERED ERROR and additional
sense code ATA PASS-THROUGH INFORMATION AVAILABLE. SAT and SAT-2
compliant implementations should then dump less to the log.
Doug Gilbert
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-12-22 19:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-12-22 18:17 does scsi_io_completion need to dump sense data for ata pass through (ck_cond = 1) ? Krzysztof Błaszkowski
2009-12-22 19:44 ` Douglas Gilbert [this message]
2009-12-22 23:11 ` Krzysztof Błaszkowski
2009-12-23 5:45 ` Douglas Gilbert
2009-12-23 11:16 ` Krzysztof Błaszkowski
2009-12-27 19:56 ` Eric Youngdale
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4B312181.30000@interlog.com \
--to=dgilbert@interlog.com \
--cc=Krzysztof.b@id-7.com \
--cc=eric@andante.org \
--cc=kb@sysmikro.com.pl \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox