From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com>
Cc: jeff@garzik.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org,
jens.axboe@oracle.com, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
James.Bottomley@suse.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
ben@decadent.org.uk, davem@davemloft.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/8] block,ide: simplify bdops->set_capacity() to ->unlock_native_capacity()
Date: Sat, 15 May 2010 20:58:02 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4BEEEEBA.9050506@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201005152048.00259.bzolnier@gmail.com>
Hello, Bartlomiej.
On 05/15/2010 08:48 PM, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> This seems to rely on an optimistic assumption that command execution
> will always be successful and that no errors on disk or host level can
> ever happen..
>
> [ The assumption in question was introduced in the previous patch:
...
> originally if the command execution failed the 'capacity' would be 0 ]
Hmm... nothing really changes by this tho. Whether unlocking succeeds
or not, the block layer will revalidate the disk and the state at that
point will be taken as the configuration to use. There really is
nothing much else to do. You try unlocking, if it unlocks, use new
capacity. If unlocking fails, revalidation will report the limited
size and block layer will have to use that. If the device dies due to
the unlocking attempt, well, the device is dead all the same.
> It also seems that the original code could be improved a lot to handle
> (very unlikely but not impossible) error situations better..
If retry is deemed necessary, it's best handled inside the per-driver
unlock handler. I don't think pushing EH logic upto block layer in
this case would be a good idea. Block layer is basically telling the
driver "do whatever you can do to unlock the native capacity, when
you're done, I'll restart from the beginning".
Thanks.
--
tejun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-05-15 18:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-05-15 18:09 [PATCHSET] block,libata: implement ->unlock_native_capacity() Tejun Heo
2010-05-15 18:09 ` [PATCH 1/8] buffer: make invalidate_bdev() drain all percpu LRU add caches Tejun Heo
2010-05-16 7:11 ` David Miller
2010-05-15 18:09 ` [PATCH 2/8] block: restart partition scan after resizing a device Tejun Heo
2010-05-16 7:15 ` David Miller
2010-05-15 18:09 ` [PATCH 3/8] block,ide: simplify bdops->set_capacity() to ->unlock_native_capacity() Tejun Heo
2010-05-15 18:48 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2010-05-15 18:58 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2010-05-16 7:15 ` David Miller
2010-05-15 18:09 ` [PATCH 4/8] block: use struct parsed_partitions *state universally in partition check code Tejun Heo
2010-05-16 7:16 ` David Miller
2010-05-15 18:09 ` [PATCH 5/8] block: improve automatic native capacity unlocking Tejun Heo
2010-05-16 7:17 ` David Miller
2010-05-15 18:09 ` [PATCH 6/8] SCSI: implement sd_unlock_native_capacity() Tejun Heo
2010-05-16 7:18 ` David Miller
2010-05-16 13:39 ` James Bottomley
2010-05-16 15:07 ` Ben Hutchings
2010-05-16 16:00 ` James Bottomley
2010-05-16 17:00 ` Tejun Heo
2010-05-16 19:23 ` James Bottomley
2010-05-17 5:30 ` Tejun Heo
2010-06-02 17:50 ` Jeff Garzik
2010-05-15 18:09 ` [PATCH 7/8] libata: use the enlarged capacity after late HPA unlock Tejun Heo
2010-05-15 19:22 ` Jeff Garzik
2010-05-16 7:18 ` David Miller
2010-05-15 18:09 ` [PATCH 8/8] libata: implement on-demand HPA unlocking Tejun Heo
2010-05-15 19:22 ` Jeff Garzik
2010-05-16 7:19 ` David Miller
2010-05-19 7:05 ` [PATCHSET] block,libata: implement ->unlock_native_capacity() Tejun Heo
2010-05-19 7:08 ` Jens Axboe
2010-06-02 16:37 ` Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4BEEEEBA.9050506@kernel.org \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=James.Bottomley@suse.de \
--cc=ben@decadent.org.uk \
--cc=bzolnier@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=jeff@garzik.org \
--cc=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).