From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tejun Heo Subject: Re: [PATCHSET] block,libata: implement ->unlock_native_capacity() Date: Wed, 19 May 2010 09:05:40 +0200 Message-ID: <4BF38DC4.3090900@gmail.com> References: <1273946974-29131-1-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1273946974-29131-1-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org> Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org To: jeff@garzik.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, jens.axboe@oracle.com, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, James.Bottomley@suse.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ben@decadent.org.uk, davem@daveml List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org On 05/15/2010 08:09 PM, Tejun Heo wrote: > Hello, all. > > This is the evolved version of the implement-set_capacity patchset[L] > and contains the following patches. > > 0001-buffer-make-invalidate_bdev-drain-all-percpu-LRU-add.patch > 0002-block-restart-partition-scan-after-resizing-a-device.patch > 0003-block-ide-simplify-bdops-set_capacity-to-unlock_nati.patch > 0004-block-use-struct-parsed_partitions-state-universally.patch > 0005-block-improve-automatic-native-capacity-unlocking.patch > 0006-SCSI-implement-sd_unlock_native_capacity.patch > 0007-libata-use-the-enlarged-capacity-after-late-HPA-unlo.patch > 0008-libata-implement-on-demand-HPA-unlocking.patch Other than block part, everything is acked, so how do we route this? 0001-0005 through block tree and 0006-0008 through libata tree seem the easiest unless someone objects. Jens, can you please review 0001-0005 and take them into block tree if it seems okay? Thanks. -- tejun