From: Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@panasas.com>
To: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Cc: James.Bottomley@suse.de, jaxboe@fusionio.com,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, Sathya.Prakash@lsi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi: fix scsi_get_lba helper function for pc command
Date: Wed, 02 Jun 2010 11:14:04 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C0612CC.6050602@panasas.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100602163313S.fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp>
On 06/02/2010 10:33 AM, FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
> This fixes scsi_get_lba() helper function for PC commands.
>
> Only the block layer is supposed to touch rq->__sector. We could
> create a new accessor for it. But it seems overdoing a bit? Jens?
>
> =
> From: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp>
> Subject: [PATCH] scsi: fix scsi_get_lba helper function for pc command
>
> scsi_get_lba() can be used to get the lba info from
> scsi_cmnd. scsi_get_lba() gets the lba info from rq->__sector so
> scsi_get_lba() returns a bogus value for PC commands (we don't use
> rq->__sector for PC commands).
>
> This patch sets rq->__sector in scsi_setup_blk_pc_cmnd() so that
> scsi_get_lba() works with PC commands.
>
> scsi_get_data_transfer_info() is taken from
> scsi_debug. scsi_get_data_transfer_info() looks useful for some
> (scsi_debug, scsi_trace, libata, etc). So I export it. I'll convert
> them to use scsi_get_data_transfer_info().
>
> Signed-off-by: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp>
> ---
> drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c | 54 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> include/scsi/scsi_cmnd.h | 4 +++
> 2 files changed, 57 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
> index 1646fe7..b9b7f40 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
> @@ -19,6 +19,7 @@
> #include <linux/delay.h>
> #include <linux/hardirq.h>
> #include <linux/scatterlist.h>
> +#include <asm/unaligned.h>
>
> #include <scsi/scsi.h>
> #include <scsi/scsi_cmnd.h>
> @@ -69,6 +70,52 @@ struct kmem_cache *scsi_sdb_cache;
>
> static void scsi_run_queue(struct request_queue *q);
>
> +int scsi_get_data_transfer_info(unsigned char *cmd, unsigned long long *lba,
> + unsigned int *num, unsigned int *ei_lba)
> +{
> + int ret = 0;
> +
> + switch (*cmd) {
> + case VARIABLE_LENGTH_CMD:
> + *lba = get_unaligned_be64(&cmd[12]);
> + *num = get_unaligned_be32(&cmd[28]);
> + *ei_lba = get_unaligned_be32(&cmd[20]);
This is true for scsi_debug maybe but totally wrong
for any none disk command set.
There is nothing you can do here leave it -1.
> + break;
> + case WRITE_16:
> + case READ_16:
> + case VERIFY_16:
> + case WRITE_SAME_16:
> + *lba = get_unaligned_be64(&cmd[2]);
> + *num = get_unaligned_be32(&cmd[10]);
> + break;
> + case WRITE_12:
> + case READ_12:
> + case VERIFY_12:
> + *lba = get_unaligned_be32(&cmd[2]);
> + *num = get_unaligned_be32(&cmd[6]);
> + break;
> + case WRITE_10:
> + case READ_10:
> + case XDWRITEREAD_10:
> + case VERIFY:
> + case WRITE_SAME:
> + *lba = get_unaligned_be32(&cmd[2]);
> + *num = get_unaligned_be16(&cmd[7]);
> + break;
> + case WRITE_6:
> + case READ_6:
> + *lba = (u32)cmd[3] | (u32)cmd[2] << 8 |
> + (u32)(cmd[1] & 0x1f) << 16;
> + *num = (0 == cmd[4]) ? 256 : cmd[4];
> + break;
> + default:
> + ret = -1;
> + break;
> + }
> + return ret;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(scsi_get_data_transfer_info);
> +
> /*
> * Function: scsi_unprep_request()
> *
> @@ -1046,6 +1093,8 @@ int scsi_setup_blk_pc_cmnd(struct scsi_device *sdev, struct request *req)
> {
> struct scsi_cmnd *cmd;
> int ret = scsi_prep_state_check(sdev, req);
> + unsigned int num, ei_lba;
> + unsigned long long lba;
>
> if (ret != BLKPREP_OK)
> return ret;
> @@ -1082,7 +1131,10 @@ int scsi_setup_blk_pc_cmnd(struct scsi_device *sdev, struct request *req)
> cmd->sc_data_direction = DMA_TO_DEVICE;
> else
> cmd->sc_data_direction = DMA_FROM_DEVICE;
> -
> +
> + scsi_get_data_transfer_info(cmd->cmnd, &lba, &num, &ei_lba);
> + req->__sector = lba;
> +
Why do it for every command. Even if no one is using it?
Only drivers/code that actually cares should call this member.
It should be easy enough to search for __sector and change them
to a function call.
This is not accepted, for osd for instance, on the hot path like this.
The few users should be fixed.
> cmd->transfersize = blk_rq_bytes(req);
> cmd->allowed = req->retries;
> return BLKPREP_OK;
> diff --git a/include/scsi/scsi_cmnd.h b/include/scsi/scsi_cmnd.h
> index a5e885a..be3c785 100644
> --- a/include/scsi/scsi_cmnd.h
> +++ b/include/scsi/scsi_cmnd.h
> @@ -151,6 +151,10 @@ extern void scsi_dma_unmap(struct scsi_cmnd *cmd);
> struct scsi_cmnd *scsi_allocate_command(gfp_t gfp_mask);
> void scsi_free_command(gfp_t gfp_mask, struct scsi_cmnd *cmd);
>
> +extern int scsi_get_data_transfer_info(unsigned char *cmd,
> + unsigned long long *lba,
> + unsigned int *num, unsigned int *ei_lba);
> +
> static inline unsigned scsi_sg_count(struct scsi_cmnd *cmd)
> {
> return cmd->sdb.table.nents;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-06-02 8:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-06-02 7:33 [PATCH] scsi: fix scsi_get_lba helper function for pc command FUJITA Tomonori
2010-06-02 8:14 ` Boaz Harrosh [this message]
2010-06-02 8:39 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2010-06-02 8:54 ` Boaz Harrosh
2010-06-02 9:05 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2010-06-02 9:23 ` Boaz Harrosh
2010-06-02 13:13 ` Martin K. Petersen
2010-06-03 10:59 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2010-06-03 11:03 ` Prakash, Sathya
2010-06-02 14:07 ` James Bottomley
2010-06-02 14:55 ` Douglas Gilbert
2010-06-03 11:18 ` FUJITA Tomonori
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4C0612CC.6050602@panasas.com \
--to=bharrosh@panasas.com \
--cc=James.Bottomley@suse.de \
--cc=Sathya.Prakash@lsi.com \
--cc=fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp \
--cc=jaxboe@fusionio.com \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox