From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mike Christie Subject: Re: [PATCH 13/15] qla4xxx: Added bsg support Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2010 19:23:52 -0500 Message-ID: <4C12D398.8020200@cs.wisc.edu> References: <20100611074900.GA27827@sles11sp1b1.qlogic.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from sabe.cs.wisc.edu ([128.105.6.20]:53681 "EHLO sabe.cs.wisc.edu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753045Ab0FLAVn (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Jun 2010 20:21:43 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20100611074900.GA27827@sles11sp1b1.qlogic.org> Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: Vikas Chaudhary Cc: james.bottomley@suse.de, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, ravi.anand@qlogic.com On 06/11/2010 02:49 AM, Vikas Chaudhary wrote: > Added BSG support to enable application support to configure > ISP40XX/ISP82XX adapter. > > This patch is on top of: http://marc.info/?l=linux-scsi&m=126999297630764&w=2 > Did James say that using vendor specific commands was ok? I did not see anything on the list. If he did, then instead of the patch above from Jay, you want to use iscsi bsg patches that I sent that handle Tomos's comments about not duplicating fc code. I sent the bsg lib to the list and then in my tree on kernel.org I ported the fc drivers (those might need a update for some patches James Smart recently sent). For those bsg patches you will want to then also add the vendor specific command back.