From: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
John Kacur <jkacur@redhat.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/7] block: push down BKL into .open and .release
Date: Thu, 08 Jul 2010 10:41:13 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C358F29.4020505@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1278514289-21054-4-git-send-email-arnd@arndb.de>
On 2010-07-07 16:51, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> The open and release block_device_operations are currently
> called with the BKL held. In order to change that, we must
> first make sure that all drivers that currently rely
> on this have no regressions.
>
> This blindly pushes the BKL into all .open and .release
> operations for all block drivers to prepare for the
> next step. The drivers can subsequently replace the BKL
> with their own locks or remove it completely when it can
> be shown that it is not needed.
>
> The functions blkdev_get and blkdev_put are the only
> remaining users of the big kernel lock in the block
> layer, besides a few uses in the ioctl code, none
> of which need to serialize with blkdev_{get,put}.
>
> Most of these two functions is also under the protection
> of bdev->bd_mutex, including the actual calls to
> ->open and ->release, and the common code does not
> access any global data structures that need the BKL.
This is missing an smp_lock.h include in i2o as well.
You seem to only add these sporadically, I think that
is a bit unsafe since you are relying on unknown
include hierarchies. That tends to break on one arch
or config even if it works in another.
--
Jens Axboe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-07-08 8:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-07-07 14:51 [PATCH 0/7] block: BKL removal, version 4 Arnd Bergmann
2010-07-07 14:51 ` [PATCH 1/7] scsi/i2o_block: cleanup ioctl handling Arnd Bergmann
2010-07-07 14:51 ` [PATCH 2/7] block: push down BKL into .locked_ioctl Arnd Bergmann
2010-07-08 8:36 ` Jens Axboe
2010-07-08 11:56 ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-07-07 14:51 ` [PATCH 3/7] block: push down BKL into .open and .release Arnd Bergmann
2010-07-08 8:41 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2010-07-08 11:59 ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-07-07 14:51 ` [PATCH 4/7] block: push BKL into blktrace ioctls Arnd Bergmann
2010-07-07 14:51 ` [PATCH 5/7] block: remove BKL from BLKROSET and BLKFLSBUF Arnd Bergmann
2010-07-07 14:51 ` [PATCH 6/7] block: remove BKL from partition ioctls Arnd Bergmann
2010-07-07 14:51 ` [PATCH 7/7] scsi/sd: remove big kernel lock Arnd Bergmann
2010-07-07 16:44 ` [PATCH 0/7] block: BKL removal, version 4 Christoph Hellwig
2010-07-07 19:36 ` Jens Axboe
2010-07-07 20:18 ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-07-08 8:53 ` Jens Axboe
2010-07-08 12:57 ` [PATCH] scsi/i2o: restore ioctl changes Arnd Bergmann
2010-07-08 12:59 ` Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4C358F29.4020505@kernel.dk \
--to=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=jkacur@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sam@ravnborg.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).