From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Vladislav Bolkhovitin Subject: Re: [Scst-devel] Fwd: Re: linuxcon 2010... Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2010 23:40:53 +0400 Message-ID: <4C72CEC5.4080204@vlnb.net> References: <4C69653E.6050808@vlnb.net> <1282077040.16098.47.camel@mulgrave.site> <4C6C1DC1.8090208@vlnb.net> <1282164188.10878.22.camel@mulgrave.site> <4C702030.2070306@vlnb.net> <1282423128.3015.35.camel@mulgrave.site> <1282582740.11194.17.camel@mulgrave.site> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.171]:52521 "EHLO moutng.kundenserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754408Ab0HWTku (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Aug 2010 15:40:50 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1282582740.11194.17.camel@mulgrave.site> Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: James Bottomley Cc: Gennadiy Nerubayev , scst-devel , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org James Bottomley, on 08/23/2010 08:59 PM wrote: > My basic conclusion was that there's no incredible discriminator between > LIO and STGT (although there are reams written on which performs better > in which circumsances, is useful for clustering, supports ALUA, etc. > each with partisans for the features). Here is a comprehensive features comparison I prepared some time ago: http://scst.sourceforge.net/comparison.html. It's a bit outdated at the moment, but I'm going to make it completely up do date in the next few days. Vlad