From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Justin P. Mattock" Subject: Re: [RFC v5]update broken web addresses in the kernel. Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2010 06:41:22 -0700 Message-ID: <4CA1F082.2010900@gmail.com> References: <1285647599-14719-1-git-send-email-justinmattock@gmail.com> <4CA193B6.8020503@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org To: Finn Thain Cc: linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org, Dimitry Torokhov , trivial@kernel.org, Mike Frysinger , linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, Randy Dunlap , Geert Uytterhoeven , "Maciej W. Rozycki" , Matt Turner , alsa-devel@alsa-project.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org On 09/28/2010 12:35 AM, Finn Thain wrote: > > On Tue, 28 Sep 2010, Justin P. Mattock wrote: > >> o.k... I'll make the changes to the arch patch, and combine the two, and >> send it to jiri.. > > Why? > > My advice is don't do it unless you want to waste reviewers' time. > >> as for the names and signed offs is what is below fine or do I need to >> change some of them? > > If you combine patch 1 and patch 2 and submit that as patch 3, you will > likely have to CC patch 3 to everyone to whom you sent patch 1 plus > everyone to whom you sent patch 2. You must also change any "acked-by" to > "Cc", since patch 3 is new. > > Keep the same CC list since Jiri is already on it ("trivial@kernel.org"). > > Finn > alright.. so it will be two patches then..(not the best at the CC etc.. thing) cool... and thanks again for reviewing this for me..(back breaking work, but somebodies _gots_ to do it..) Justin P. Mattock