linux-scsi.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Douglas Gilbert <dgilbert@interlog.com>
To: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xenotime.net>
Cc: linux-scsi <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
	James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@suse.de>,
	"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi_mid_low_api.txt recommend resid usage
Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2010 11:08:20 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D1CAE74.10005@interlog.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20101224094612.8056bbcd.rdunlap@xenotime.net>

Randy,
Add some extra words to define what is expected if
a transport can do out-of-order data delivery
(e.g. FCP_RESID, theoretically, is not precisely
the resid we want).

diff --git a/Documentation/scsi/scsi_mid_low_api.txt 
b/Documentation/scsi/scsi_mid_low_api.txt
index df322c1..d998af0 100644
--- a/Documentation/scsi/scsi_mid_low_api.txt
+++ b/Documentation/scsi/scsi_mid_low_api.txt
@@ -185,7 +185,7 @@ scsi_remove_host() ---------+
  scsi_host_put()
  ------------------------------------------------------------

-It may be useful for a LLD to keep track of struct Scsi_Host instances
+It may be useful for an LLD to keep track of struct Scsi_Host instances
  (a pointer is returned by scsi_host_alloc()). Such instances are "owned"
  by the mid-level.  struct Scsi_Host instances are freed from
  scsi_host_put() when the reference count hits zero.
@@ -749,7 +749,7 @@ void scsi_unblock_requests(struct Scsi_Host * shost)
   *
   *      Notes: Should not be invoked if the "hotplug initialization
   *      model" is being used. Called internally by exit_this_scsi_driver()
- *      in the "passive initialization model". Hence a LLD has no need to
+ *      in the "passive initialization model". Hence an LLD has no need to
   *      call this function directly.
   *
   *      Defined in: drivers/scsi/hosts.c .
@@ -1343,7 +1343,7 @@ Members of interest:
                     underruns (overruns should be rare). If possible an LLD
                     should set 'resid' prior to invoking 'done'. The most
                     interesting case is data transfers from a SCSI target
-                   device device (i.e. READs) that underrun.
+                   device (e.g. READs) that underrun.
      underflow    - LLD should place (DID_ERROR << 16) in 'result' if
                     actual number of bytes transferred is less than this
                     figure. Not many LLDs implement this check and some that
@@ -1351,6 +1351,22 @@ Members of interest:
                     report a DID_ERROR. Better for an LLD to implement
                     'resid'.

+It is recommended that an LLD set 'resid' on data transfers from a SCSI
+target device (e.g. READs). It is especially important that 'resid' is set
+when such data transfers have sense keys of MEDIUM ERROR and HARDWARE ERROR
+(and possibly RECOVERED ERROR). In these cases if an LLD is in doubt how much
+data has been received then the safest approach is to indicate no bytes have
+been received. For example: to indicate that no valid data has been received
+an LLD might use these helpers:
+    scsi_set_resid(SCpnt, scsi_bufflen(SCpnt));
+where 'SCpnt' is a pointer to a scsi_cmnd object. To indicate only three 512
+bytes blocks has been received 'resid' could be set like this:
+    scsi_set_resid(SCpnt, scsi_bufflen(SCpnt) - (3 * 512));
+
+For transports that can do "out of order" delivery of data from a SCSI target
+device, the 'resid' should reflect the number of valid, consecutive bytes
+from the start of the buffer.
+
  The scsi_cmnd structure is defined in include/scsi/scsi_cmnd.h


Doug Gilbert


On 10-12-24 12:46 PM, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On Thu, 23 Dec 2010 21:40:37 -0500 Douglas Gilbert wrote:
>
>> As discussed in a thread on this list titled:
>>      "RFC: short reads on block devices"
>> this patch adds recommendations for LLDs to set resid
>> when there might be uncertainty about how much data
>> has been returned by a device.
>>
>> This patch inline and attached] is against scsi-misc-2.6.git
>>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Douglas Gilbert<dgilbert@interlog.com>
>>
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/scsi/scsi_mid_low_api.txt
>> b/Documentation/scsi/scsi_mid_low_api.txt
>> index df322c1..7bcdea7 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/scsi/scsi_mid_low_api.txt
>> +++ b/Documentation/scsi/scsi_mid_low_api.txt
>
>> @@ -1351,6 +1351,18 @@ Members of interest:
>>                       report a DID_ERROR. Better for an LLD to implement
>>                       'resid'.
>>
>> +It is recommended that a LLD set 'resid' on data transfers from a SCSI
>> +target device (e.g. READs). It is especially important that 'resid' is set
>> +when such data transfers have sense keys of MEDIUM ERROR and HARDWARE ERROR
>> +(and possibly RECOVERED ERROR). In these cases if a LLD is in doubt how much
>> +data has been received then the safest approach is to indicate no bytes have
>> +been received. For example: to indicate that no valid data has been received
>> +a LLD might use these helpers:
>> +    scsi_set_resid(SCpnt, scsi_bufflen(SCpnt));
>> +where 'SCpnt' is a pointer to a scsi_cmnd object. To indicate only three 512
>> +bytes blocks has been received 'resid' could be set like this:
>> +    scsi_set_resid(SCpnt, scsi_bufflen(SCpnt) - (3 * 512));
>> +
>>    The scsi_cmnd structure is defined in include/scsi/scsi_cmnd.h
>
>
> Hi Doug,
>
> Using "an LLD" instead of "a LLD" would be more consistent with the rest
> of this txt file (and read better to me).
>
>
> ---
> ~Randy
> *** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***
> desserts:  http://www.xenotime.net/linux/recipes/
>


  parent reply	other threads:[~2010-12-30 16:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-12-24  2:40 [PATCH] scsi_mid_low_api.txt recommend resid usage Douglas Gilbert
2010-12-24 17:46 ` Randy Dunlap
2010-12-24 20:17   ` Douglas Gilbert
2010-12-24 20:36     ` Randy Dunlap
2010-12-30 16:08   ` Douglas Gilbert [this message]
2010-12-30 17:50     ` Randy Dunlap

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4D1CAE74.10005@interlog.com \
    --to=dgilbert@interlog.com \
    --cc=James.Bottomley@suse.de \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
    --cc=rdunlap@xenotime.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).