public inbox for linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: maksim.rayskiy@gmail.com, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH] Deferred disk spinup during system resume
Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2011 13:35:07 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D2DF45B.5010101@pobox.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110112112142.GA9610@mtj.dyndns.org>

On 01/12/2011 06:21 AM, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello, Maksim, Jeff.
>
> On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 05:24:17PM -0800, maksim.rayskiy@gmail.com wrote:
>> @@ -4978,6 +4978,13 @@ void ata_qc_issue(struct ata_queued_cmd *qc)
>>   	struct ata_link *link = qc->dev->link;
>>   	u8 prot = qc->tf.protocol;
>>
>> +	if (unlikely(qc->flags&  ATA_QCFLAG_VERIFY)) {
>> +		ata_port_schedule_eh(ap);
>> +		qc->scsidone(qc->scsicmd);
>> +		ata_qc_free(qc);
>> +		return;
>
> I still prefer the original patch where EH is scheduled from the
> translation layer.  This seems unnecessarily intrusive to me.  As I
> wrote before, it's not like we have a clean translation anyway and I
> think this better fits as impedance matching code in the translation
> layer anyway.  But, that said, this is a rather ugly piece of code
> which is necessary just to work around the fact that we live under
> scsi, so as long as it works, one way or the other probably doesn't
> matter all that much (the reason why I prefer the previous one, as it
> doens't try to be pretty and just gets it done), so it's Jeff's call.

The previous patch breaks READ VERIFY translation for all cases -except- 
this one.

The bottom line is that this patch simply wants to trigger an ATA 
command, and return immediately, discarding the command results.  I'm 
not even sure a "run this command in background, and discard results" 
facility requires the EH.

	Jeff




  reply	other threads:[~2011-01-12 18:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-01-12  1:24 [RFC/PATCH] Deferred disk spinup during system resume maksim.rayskiy
2011-01-12 11:21 ` Tejun Heo
2011-01-12 18:35   ` Jeff Garzik [this message]
2011-01-12 20:01     ` Maksim Rayskiy
2011-01-13 15:39       ` Tejun Heo
2011-01-19  7:05       ` Jeff Garzik
2011-01-19 20:29         ` Maksim Rayskiy
2011-01-20  6:01           ` Jeff Garzik
2011-01-13 15:37     ` Tejun Heo
2011-01-13 17:20       ` Jeff Garzik
2011-01-13 17:24         ` Tejun Heo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4D2DF45B.5010101@pobox.com \
    --to=jgarzik@pobox.com \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maksim.rayskiy@gmail.com \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox