From: Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@suse.de>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, Herbert Poetzl <herbert@13thfloor.at>,
linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: PMP and SEMB messages to SEP
Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2011 13:55:15 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D349093.6070902@garzik.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1295281131.3015.44.camel@mulgrave.site>
On 01/17/2011 11:18 AM, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-01-17 at 16:40 +0100, Tejun Heo wrote:
>>> - the SiI3726 supports GPIO pins, which can be reached via
>>> the General Status and Control Register [130] and accoring
>>> to the docu, the Read/Write Port Multiplier command can
>>> be used to read/write that register.
>>>
>>> + how would I go about issuing such a command and where
>>> should it be done? i.e. what about interference with
>>> other commands? what about retrieving return values?
>>
>> The problem is that the PMP device itself is currently not allocated a
>> userland visible device, so it doesn't have any /dev/* node. Hmmm...
>
> So perhaps it should be. If you look at the equivalent topology on SAS,
> our expanders have a bsg device node precisely so that we can do this.
>
> That said, SAS expanders have a defined protocol (SAS Management
> Protocol) to talk to the outside world, so they are real visible objects
> always in our topology ... I'm not sure PMP has this ... it seems that
> all PMP visibility is an extension to the standard?
Yes, we do need a way to address these devices.
Jeff
prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-01-17 18:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20110113192558.GE16039@MAIL.13thfloor.at>
[not found] ` <20110114142018.GA978@htj.dyndns.org>
[not found] ` <20110114165957.GH16039@MAIL.13thfloor.at>
[not found] ` <20110114170407.GE978@htj.dyndns.org>
[not found] ` <20110114173759.GI16039@MAIL.13thfloor.at>
2011-01-17 15:40 ` PMP and SEMB messages to SEP Tejun Heo
2011-01-17 16:18 ` James Bottomley
2011-01-17 17:13 ` Herbert Poetzl
2011-01-17 17:20 ` Tejun Heo
2011-01-17 17:34 ` Herbert Poetzl
2011-01-17 17:39 ` Tejun Heo
2011-01-17 17:48 ` Herbert Poetzl
2011-01-17 18:05 ` James Bottomley
2011-01-17 18:21 ` Herbert Poetzl
2011-01-17 18:27 ` Herbert Poetzl
2011-01-17 17:18 ` Tejun Heo
2011-01-17 17:21 ` James Bottomley
2011-01-17 17:24 ` Tejun Heo
2011-01-25 3:07 ` Herbert Poetzl
2011-01-25 14:14 ` James Bottomley
2011-04-03 17:39 ` Herbert Poetzl
2011-04-03 18:38 ` James Bottomley
2011-01-17 18:55 ` Jeff Garzik [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4D349093.6070902@garzik.org \
--to=jeff@garzik.org \
--cc=James.Bottomley@suse.de \
--cc=herbert@13thfloor.at \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox