From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: James Smart Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] lpfc 8.3.21: Update lpfc to revision 8.3.21 Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2011 13:20:22 -0500 Message-ID: <4D5C1566.1040307@emulex.com> References: <1297877936.1492.19.camel@wookie> <1297879459.3014.200.camel@mulgrave.site> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from exht1.emulex.com ([138.239.113.183]:8073 "EHLO exht1.ad.emulex.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751504Ab1BPSUo (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Feb 2011 13:20:44 -0500 In-Reply-To: <1297879459.3014.200.camel@mulgrave.site> Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: James Bottomley Cc: "linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org" next merge window is fine. As for stable@kernel.org - probably. -- james s On 2/16/2011 1:04 PM, James Bottomley wrote: > So I'll apply them agains the scsi-misc tree for the next merge window, > but would a cc: stable@kernel.org tag be appropriate? As in will they > apply on their own to the stable tree once upstream? > > James > >