* [PATCH 0/6] lpfc 8.3.21: Update lpfc to revision 8.3.21
@ 2011-02-16 17:38 James Smart
2011-02-16 18:04 ` James Bottomley
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: James Smart @ 2011-02-16 17:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-scsi
This patch set updates the lpfc driver to revision 8.3.21
The patches for 8.3.21. contain:
- Critical Errors and Bug Fixes
- RRQ Implementation fixes.
- FC Discovery changes.
- Initialization and user interface changes.
- Debugfs additions.
- Change lpfc driver version to 8.3.21.
The bugfixes were cut against scsi-misc-2.6
-- james s
Signed-off-by: Alex Iannicelli <alex.iannicelli@emulex.com>
Signed-off-by: James Smart <james.smart@emulex.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 0/6] lpfc 8.3.21: Update lpfc to revision 8.3.21
2011-02-16 17:38 [PATCH 0/6] lpfc 8.3.21: Update lpfc to revision 8.3.21 James Smart
@ 2011-02-16 18:04 ` James Bottomley
2011-02-16 18:20 ` James Smart
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: James Bottomley @ 2011-02-16 18:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: james.smart; +Cc: linux-scsi
On Wed, 2011-02-16 at 12:38 -0500, James Smart wrote:
> This patch set updates the lpfc driver to revision 8.3.21
>
> The patches for 8.3.21. contain:
>
> - Critical Errors and Bug Fixes
> - RRQ Implementation fixes.
> - FC Discovery changes.
> - Initialization and user interface changes.
> - Debugfs additions.
> - Change lpfc driver version to 8.3.21.
>
> The bugfixes were cut against scsi-misc-2.6
So I'll apply them agains the scsi-misc tree for the next merge window,
but would a cc: stable@kernel.org tag be appropriate? As in will they
apply on their own to the stable tree once upstream?
James
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 0/6] lpfc 8.3.21: Update lpfc to revision 8.3.21
2011-02-16 18:04 ` James Bottomley
@ 2011-02-16 18:20 ` James Smart
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: James Smart @ 2011-02-16 18:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: James Bottomley; +Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
next merge window is fine. As for stable@kernel.org - probably.
-- james s
On 2/16/2011 1:04 PM, James Bottomley wrote:
> So I'll apply them agains the scsi-misc tree for the next merge window,
> but would a cc: stable@kernel.org tag be appropriate? As in will they
> apply on their own to the stable tree once upstream?
>
> James
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2011-02-16 18:20 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-02-16 17:38 [PATCH 0/6] lpfc 8.3.21: Update lpfc to revision 8.3.21 James Smart
2011-02-16 18:04 ` James Bottomley
2011-02-16 18:20 ` James Smart
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox