From: David Milburn <dmilburn@redhat.com>
To: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: james.bottomley@suse.de, dave.jiang@intel.com,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, jacek.danecki@intel.com,
ed.ciechanowski@intel.com, jeffrey.d.skirvin@intel.com,
edmund.nadolski@intel.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/6] isci: task (libsas interface support)
Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2011 12:48:20 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D5C1BF4.2050100@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTinfhEO2uXW94S9q++D8dNjBpOy1_3s64X=ScbLY@mail.gmail.com>
Dan Williams wrote:
> Thanks David, comments below.
>
>>> + if (task->task_state_flags & SAS_TASK_STATE_ABORTED) {
>>> +
>>> + isci_task_complete_for_upper_layer(
>>> + task,
>>> + SAS_TASK_UNDELIVERED,
>>> + SAM_STAT_TASK_ABORTED,
>>> + isci_perform_normal_io_completion
>>> + );
>>> +
>>> + return 0; /* The I/O was accepted (and failed). */
>> Dan, is this the right status to return to libsas?
>>
>> Looks like it checks (->lldd_execute_task) for non-zero result.
>
> I think this is self defense that can be deleted, how can a task be
> aborted before it has even returned from the submission routine.
>
>>> + }
>>> + if ((task->dev == NULL) || (task->dev->port == NULL)) {
>>> +
>>> + /* Indicate SAS_TASK_UNDELIVERED, so that the scsi
>>> midlayer
>>> + * removes the target.
>>> + */
>>> + isci_task_complete_for_upper_layer(
>>> + task,
>>> + SAS_TASK_UNDELIVERED,
>>> + SAS_DEVICE_UNKNOWN,
>>> + isci_perform_normal_io_completion
>>> + );
>>> + return 0; /* The I/O was accepted (and failed). */
>> Same here?
>
> Yeah, we should always be able to dereference task->dev because ->dev
> is referenced counted against outstanding commands. If we have a task
> by definition we have a dev.
>
> [..]
>>> + */
>>> + isci_task_build_tmf(&tmf, isci_device, isci_tmf_ssp_lun_reset,
>>> NULL,
>>> + NULL);
>>> +
>>> + #define ISCI_LU_RESET_TIMEOUT_MS 2000 /* 2 second timeout. */
>> Maybe move #define to isci_task.h?
>
> Ok.
>
>>> + ret = isci_task_execute_tmf(isci_host, &tmf,
>>> ISCI_LU_RESET_TIMEOUT_MS);
>>> +
>>> + if (ret == TMF_RESP_FUNC_COMPLETE)
>>> + dev_dbg(&isci_host->pdev->dev,
>>> + "%s: %p: TMF_LU_RESET passed\n",
>>> + __func__, isci_device);
>>> + else
>>> + dev_dbg(&isci_host->pdev->dev,
>>> + "%s: %p: TMF_LU_RESET failed (%x)\n",
>>> + __func__, isci_device, ret);
>>> +
>>> + return ret;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +/**
>>> +
>>> +/* int (*lldd_clear_nexus_port)(struct asd_sas_port *); */
>>> +int isci_task_clear_nexus_port(struct asd_sas_port *port)
>>> +{
>>> + return TMF_RESP_FUNC_FAILED;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +
>>> +
>>> +int isci_task_clear_nexus_ha(struct sas_ha_struct *ha)
>>> +{
>>> + return TMF_RESP_FUNC_FAILED;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +int isci_task_I_T_nexus_reset(struct domain_device *dev)
>>> +{
>>> + return TMF_RESP_FUNC_FAILED;
>>> +}
>>> +
>> These will be used during libsas error handling.
>
> The driver implements abort_task, and promotes the rest to lu_reset.
> Assuming the documentation is not out of date:
>
> A SAS LLDD should also implement at least one of the Task
> Management Functions (TMFs) described in SAM:
>
> ...how urgent is the need for these other task management routines?
Dan,
Looks like some of these will be used down the scsi error handling
path
scsi_error_handler
eh_strategy_handler (sas_scsi_recover_host)
sas_eh_handle_sas_errors
For some of these you may be able to build and execute, something
like
isci_task_abort_task()
{
isci_task_build_tmf(TMF_ABORT_TASK)
isci_task_execute_tmf()
}
Also, looks like other libsas drivers do a phy reset from
lldd_I_T_nexus_reset,
probably ok to eliminate lldd_clear_aca for now.
>
> Speaking of mandatory libsas methods all other libsas drivers outside
> of aic94xx forgo implementing
>
> /* Port and Adapter management */
> int (*lldd_clear_nexus_port)(struct sas_port *);
> int (*lldd_clear_nexus_ha)(struct sas_ha_struct *);
>
> A SAS LLDD should implement at least one of those.
>
> ...not clear that at least one of those is mandatory.
>
Yes, good point, probably ok to initially eliminate these.
Thanks,
David
>>
>>> +/**
>>> + * isci_task_abort_task() - This function is one of the SAS Domain
>>> Template
>>> + * functions. This function is called by libsas to abort a specified
>>> task.
>>> + * @task: This parameter specifies the SAS task to abort.
>>> + *
>>> + * status, zero indicates success.
>>> + */
>>> +int isci_task_abort_task(struct sas_task *task)
>>> +{
>> scic_lock, flags);
>>
>>
>>> +
>>> + #define ISCI_ABORT_TASK_TIMEOUT_MS 500 /* half second
>>> timeout. */
>> Maybe move this #define to isci_task.h?
>
> Ok.
>
> [..]
>>> + * isci_task_abort_task_set() - This function is one of the SAS Domain
>>> Template
>>> + * functions. This is one of the Task Management functoins called by
>>> libsas,
>>> + * to abort all task for the given lun.
>>> + * @d_device: This parameter specifies the domain device associated with
>>> this
>>> + * request.
>>> + * @lun: This parameter specifies the lun associated with this request.
>>> + *
>>> + * status, zero indicates success.
>>> + */
>>> +int isci_task_abort_task_set(
>>> + struct domain_device *d_device,
>>> + u8 *lun)
>>> +{
>>> + return TMF_RESP_FUNC_FAILED;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +
>>> +/**
>>> + * isci_task_clear_aca() - This function is one of the SAS Domain
>>> Template
>>> + * functions. This is one of the Task Management functoins called by
>>> libsas.
>>> + * @d_device: This parameter specifies the domain device associated with
>>> this
>>> + * request.
>>> + * @lun: This parameter specifies the lun associated with this
>>> request.
>>> + *
>>> + * status, zero indicates success.
>>> + */
>>> +int isci_task_clear_aca(
>>> + struct domain_device *d_device,
>>> + u8 *lun)
>>> +{
>>> + return TMF_RESP_FUNC_FAILED;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +
>>> +
>>> +/**
>>> + * isci_task_clear_task_set() - This function is one of the SAS Domain
>>> Template
>>> + * functions. This is one of the Task Management functoins called by
>>> libsas.
>>> + * @d_device: This parameter specifies the domain device associated with
>>> this
>>> + * request.
>>> + * @lun: This parameter specifies the lun associated with this
>>> request.
>>> + *
>>> + * status, zero indicates success.
>>> + */
>>> +int isci_task_clear_task_set(
>>> + struct domain_device *d_device,
>>> + u8 *lun)
>>> +{
>>> + return TMF_RESP_FUNC_FAILED;
>>> +}
>> More libsas error recovery functions.
>
> Same comment as above the driver has the little and the big recovery
> hammers, the medium hammers can be prioritized behind other fixes I
> think.
>
> --
> Dan
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-02-16 18:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-02-07 0:34 [RFC PATCH 0/6] isci: initial driver release (part1: intro and lldd) Dan Williams
2011-02-07 0:34 ` [RFC PATCH 1/6] isci: initialization Dan Williams
2011-02-17 8:22 ` Jeff Garzik
2011-02-19 0:12 ` Dan Williams
2011-02-17 8:25 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-02-19 0:23 ` Dan Williams
2011-03-04 23:35 ` James Bottomley
2011-03-08 1:51 ` Dan Williams
2011-03-18 16:51 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-02-07 0:34 ` [RFC PATCH 2/6] isci: task (libsas interface support) Dan Williams
2011-02-09 15:01 ` David Milburn
2011-02-14 7:14 ` Dan Williams
2011-02-16 18:48 ` David Milburn [this message]
2011-02-16 19:35 ` David Milburn
2011-02-07 0:34 ` [RFC PATCH 3/6] isci: request (core request infrastructure) Dan Williams
2011-03-18 16:41 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-02-07 0:34 ` [RFC PATCH 4/6] isci: hardware / topology event handling Dan Williams
2011-03-18 16:18 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-03-23 8:15 ` Dan Williams
2011-03-23 8:40 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-03-23 9:04 ` Dan Williams
2011-03-23 9:08 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-03-24 0:07 ` Dan Williams
2011-03-24 6:26 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-03-25 0:57 ` Dan Williams
2011-03-25 19:45 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-03-25 21:39 ` Dan Williams
2011-03-25 22:07 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-03-25 22:34 ` Dan Williams
2011-03-27 22:28 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-03-29 1:11 ` Dan Williams
2011-03-30 0:37 ` Dan Williams
2011-02-07 0:35 ` [RFC PATCH 5/6] isci: phy, port, and remote device Dan Williams
2011-02-07 0:35 ` [RFC PATCH 6/6] isci: sata support and phy settings via request_firmware() Dan Williams
2011-02-07 7:58 ` [RFC PATCH 1/6] isci: initialization jack_wang
2011-02-14 7:49 ` Dan Williams
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4D5C1BF4.2050100@redhat.com \
--to=dmilburn@redhat.com \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=dave.jiang@intel.com \
--cc=ed.ciechanowski@intel.com \
--cc=edmund.nadolski@intel.com \
--cc=jacek.danecki@intel.com \
--cc=james.bottomley@suse.de \
--cc=jeffrey.d.skirvin@intel.com \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).