From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Douglas Gilbert Subject: Re: Thin provisioning trivial Update Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2011 12:19:36 -0500 Message-ID: <4D693628.7090301@interlog.com> References: <1298703585-15387-1-git-send-email-shyam_iyer@dell.com> Reply-To: dgilbert@interlog.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from smtp.infotech.no ([82.134.31.41]:55257 "EHLO smtp.infotech.no" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751300Ab1BZRTq (ORCPT ); Sat, 26 Feb 2011 12:19:46 -0500 In-Reply-To: <1298703585-15387-1-git-send-email-shyam_iyer@dell.com> Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: shyam.iyer.t@gmail.com Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, "Martin K. Petersen" On 11-02-26 01:59 AM, shyam.iyer.t@gmail.com wrote: > The first patch logs a kernel warning message for the THIN PROVISIONING SOFT THRESHOLD REACHED Unit Attention > The second patch adds the THIN PROVISIONING SOFT THRESHOLD REACHED Unit Attention to scsi constants As of SBC-3 draft revision 25 (27 October 2010) most uses of "thin provisioning" have been renamed "logical block provisioning". Further changes in this direction occurred in SBC-3 draft revision 26 and I suspect there are more to come. However thin provisioning lives on, essentially as a special case of logical block provisioning. As of the current drafts of SBC-3 and SPC-4 additional sense code 38h,7h has the description you have given. Memo to Martin Petersen and myself: scsi_debug needs options and variables renamed due to these changes by t10. Doug Gilbert