From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff Garzik Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 00/10] isci: core Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2011 17:04:54 -0400 Message-ID: <4D7FD476.8070100@garzik.org> References: <20110310105347.6485.20780.stgit@localhost6.localdomain6> <4D7FA620.10004@garzik.org> <20110315175533.GA8291@infradead.org> <4D7FAB3A.9060903@garzik.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail-qw0-f46.google.com ([209.85.216.46]:48240 "EHLO mail-qw0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758771Ab1COVE5 (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Mar 2011 17:04:57 -0400 Received: by qwk3 with SMTP id 3so815521qwk.19 for ; Tue, 15 Mar 2011 14:04:57 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: Dan Williams Cc: Christoph Hellwig , james.bottomley@suse.de, dave.jiang@intel.com, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, jacek.danecki@intel.com, ed.ciechanowski@intel.com, jeffrey.d.skirvin@intel.com, edmund.nadolski@intel.com On 03/15/2011 04:13 PM, Dan Williams wrote: > Whether it is drivers/staging/ or drivers/scsi/ having a few more > weeks to at least allow for a SCSI focused review (and the resulting > cleanups / fixes) before merging is the important point. Oh, agreed. Not trying to rush past that part. And there's still plenty of work that wants doing. I just don't want to get stuck behind the "wall of perfection," either. :) Jeff