From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Brian King Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] tcm ibmvscsis driver Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2011 16:01:00 -0500 Message-ID: <4D87BC8C.5090104@linux.vnet.ibm.com> References: <20110307134033K.fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp> <1299508803.12730.1.camel@mulgrave.site> <4D83C78D.5040908@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20110321100909E.fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from e8.ny.us.ibm.com ([32.97.182.138]:43996 "EHLO e8.ny.us.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751803Ab1CUVBF (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Mar 2011 17:01:05 -0400 Received: from d01dlp01.pok.ibm.com (d01dlp01.pok.ibm.com [9.56.224.56]) by e8.ny.us.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1) with ESMTP id p2LKaXj7000669 for ; Mon, 21 Mar 2011 16:36:33 -0400 Received: from d01relay06.pok.ibm.com (d01relay06.pok.ibm.com [9.56.227.116]) by d01dlp01.pok.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2089E38C803B for ; Mon, 21 Mar 2011 17:00:59 -0400 (EDT) Received: from d01av02.pok.ibm.com (d01av02.pok.ibm.com [9.56.224.216]) by d01relay06.pok.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id p2LL138V2486324 for ; Mon, 21 Mar 2011 17:01:03 -0400 Received: from d01av02.pok.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d01av02.pok.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id p2LL12X9008425 for ; Mon, 21 Mar 2011 18:01:03 -0300 In-Reply-To: <20110321100909E.fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp> Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: FUJITA Tomonori Cc: James.Bottomley@suse.de, nab@linux-iscsi.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org On 03/20/2011 08:09 PM, FUJITA Tomonori wrote: > Thanks for the testings, > > On Fri, 18 Mar 2011 15:58:53 -0500 > Brian King wrote: > >> On 03/07/2011 08:40 AM, James Bottomley wrote: >>> On Mon, 2011-03-07 at 13:41 +0900, FUJITA Tomonori wrote: >>>> On Sat, 12 Feb 2011 14:27:26 -0600 >>>> James Bottomley wrote: >>>> >>>>>> Disregard my previous comment. It looks like current client should handle reservations >>>>>> just fine without any further changes. >>>>> >>>>> So is that an ack for putting this in scsi-misc ... or did you want to >>>>> do more testing first? >>>> >>>> Ping, >>>> >>>> Brian, James, can we merge this during the next merge window? >>> >>> I'm still waiting for an ack from Brian. >> >> Sorry for the delay... I've got this loaded in the lab and have managed to oops >> a couple times. The first one was during shutdown, which I wasn't able to collect >> any data for. The most recent occurred when a client was trying to login for the >> first time: > > You mean that the kernel crashes every time when a client logs in? I think the crash I was seeing when the client logs in was just due to the fact that I had things misconfigured. It took me a bit to figure out the configfs stuff. Didn't realize at first I had to go off and manually create a lot of the configfs layout described in the wiki page. Once I did that, I was able to get a LUN to successfully report in on the client side. I'll start pounding on this a bit and see how things hold up. Thanks, Brian -- Brian King Linux on Power Virtualization IBM Linux Technology Center