From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andy Grover Subject: Re: rtsadmin-v1.99 BETA packages Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 18:26:08 -0700 Message-ID: <4DCB3730.6060105@redhat.com> References: <1304121705.14278.196.camel@haakon2.linux-iscsi.org> <1304553788.10072.241.camel@haakon2.linux-iscsi.org> <4DCAC075.5090007@redhat.com> <1305160226.19744.47.camel@haakon2.linux-iscsi.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:51369 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752614Ab1ELB0a (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 May 2011 21:26:30 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1305160226.19744.47.camel@haakon2.linux-iscsi.org> Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: linux-iscsi-target-dev@googlegroups.com Cc: "Nicholas A. Bellinger" , Mike Christie , Christoph Hellwig , Hannes Reinecke , James Bottomley , Boaz Harrosh , "Patil, Kiran" , "Love, Robert W" , Madhu Iyengar , Andrew Vasquez , Jerome Martin , Marc Fleischmann , FUJITA Tomonori , "J.H." , "H. Peter Anvin" , Matthew Wilcox , Stefan Hajnoczi , linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org On 05/11/2011 05:30 PM, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote: > Thanks alot for this status update wrt to rtsadmin-v2 userspace. I am > really looking forward to seeing rtsadmin-v2 community edition available > very soon in Fedora rawhide. We (RTS) are also very excited to expose > the v2 shell to a larger audience using mainline >= .38 target v4 > infrastructure. Hi nab, I've packaged rtsadmin + deps for f14 and f15, instead of rawhide. Fedora 14/15 users can add this repo: http://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/grover/rtsadmin/fedora-rtsadmin.repo These are currently lacking docs but are functional. Do I need to package lio-utils, or will it (imho preferably) be merged into rtsadmin before 2.0? Also, RPM really likes to start with a tarball from upstream -- I made these myself from git for this snapshot, but real, upstream tarballs are of course preferable, and leads me to ask: when should we expect the official 2.0 release? > We believe that having an interactive target shell and python > library available to developers and users is criticaly important to > the success of the mainline target ecosystem as a whole. We are very > proud to be able to work with the upstream community to achieve this > important milestone with the v2 shell. Of course, for rtsadmin packages *you* are the upstream. :) Congrats -- Regards -- Andy