From: Jens Axboe <jaxboe@fusionio.com>
To: Parag Warudkar <parag.lkml@gmail.com>
Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com"
<James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com>,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org,
Linux SCSI List <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] SCSI IOCTL: Check for device deletion [was Re: __elv_add_request OOPS]
Date: Wed, 25 May 2011 09:37:44 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4DDCB1C8.7040708@fusionio.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1105242127340.3472@ubuntu-natty>
On 2011-05-25 03:41, Parag Warudkar wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, 24 May 2011, Jens Axboe wrote:
>
>> On 2011-05-24 06:29, Parag Warudkar wrote:
>>>
>>> External DVD drive - connected when suspended, removed before resume.
>>> Results in NULL pointer dereference in __blk_add_request on resume.
>>>
>>> *ffffffff811d6503: 48 89 58 08 mov %rbx,0x8(%rax) |
>>> %ebx = ffff880131559020 <--- faulting instruction
>>>
>>> 48 89 58 08 appears only in list_add :
>>>
>>> static inline void list_add(struct list_head *new, struct list_head *head)
>>> {
>>> __list_add(new, head, head->next);
>>> ffffffff81ac012c: 49 8b 04 24 mov (%r12),%rax
>>> #ifndef CONFIG_DEBUG_LIST
>>> static inline void __list_add(struct list_head *new,
>>> struct list_head *prev,
>>> struct list_head *next)
>>> {
>>> next->prev = new;
>>> ffffffff81ac0130: 48 89 58 08 mov %rbx,0x8(%rax)
>>>
>>> AFAICS list_add is only called from one place in __elv_add_request :
>>>
>>> switch (where) {
>>> case ELEVATOR_INSERT_REQUEUE:
>>> case ELEVATOR_INSERT_FRONT:
>>> rq->cmd_flags |= REQ_SOFTBARRIER;
>>> ** list_add(&rq->queuelist, &q->queue_head);
>>> break;
>>>
>>> Now, where is the patch? :)
>>
>> You forgot to attach it?
>>
>> This is clearly q == NULL [snip]
>
> OK, I think this patch should do the trick.
>
> Signed-off-by: Parag Warudkar <parag.lkml@gmail.com>
> Reported-and-tested-by: Parag Warudkar <parag.lkml@gmail.com>
>
> Check for device deletion before sending it a scsi command. This fixes an
> OOPS I was seeing during resume when the external dvd drive was removed
> while suspended.
>
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_ioctl.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_ioctl.c
> index d9564fb..cc4edbf 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_ioctl.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_ioctl.c
> @@ -136,7 +136,7 @@ int scsi_set_medium_removal(struct scsi_device *sdev, char state)
> char scsi_cmd[MAX_COMMAND_SIZE];
> int ret;
>
> - if (!sdev->removable || !sdev->lockable)
> + if (!sdev->removable || !sdev->lockable || sdev->sdev_state == SDEV_DEL)
> return 0;
>
> scsi_cmd[0] = ALLOW_MEDIUM_REMOVAL;
While this will fix your particular oops, I don't think it's quite
right. It's fixing one particular piece of fall out from attempting to
talk to a removed device, it's not necessarily fixing the full class of
them. The other checks in scsi_set_medium_removal() aren't related to a
changing state of the device, they are capability checks.
--
Jens Axboe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-05-25 7:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <alpine.DEB.2.02.1105232329040.1910@natty-nar>
2011-05-24 10:44 ` __elv_add_request OOPS Jens Axboe
2011-05-25 1:41 ` [PATCH] SCSI IOCTL: Check for device deletion [was Re: __elv_add_request OOPS] Parag Warudkar
2011-05-25 7:37 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2011-05-25 18:44 ` Parag Warudkar
2011-05-25 18:55 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-05-25 19:02 ` Jens Axboe
2011-05-25 19:13 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-05-25 19:17 ` Jens Axboe
2011-05-25 19:52 ` Parag Warudkar
2011-05-25 20:03 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-05-25 20:18 ` Parag Warudkar
2011-05-25 20:26 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-05-25 20:42 ` Parag Warudkar
2011-05-25 20:52 ` James Bottomley
2011-05-25 23:00 ` Parag Warudkar
2011-05-25 23:14 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-05-25 23:45 ` Parag Warudkar
2011-05-25 23:52 ` Linus Torvalds
[not found] ` <1306370123.1641.76.camel@mulgrave.site>
2011-05-26 1:01 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-05-26 1:06 ` James Bottomley
2011-05-26 1:43 ` Parag Warudkar
2011-05-27 3:53 ` James Bottomley
2011-05-27 5:43 ` Jens Axboe
2011-05-27 20:21 ` James Bottomley
2011-05-28 12:42 ` Jens Axboe
2011-06-08 6:50 ` Torsten Hilbrich
2011-05-25 20:20 ` James Bottomley
2011-05-25 20:22 ` Parag Warudkar
2011-05-25 20:29 ` James Bottomley
2011-05-25 20:26 ` __elv_add_request OOPS James Bottomley
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4DDCB1C8.7040708@fusionio.com \
--to=jaxboe@fusionio.com \
--cc=James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=parag.lkml@gmail.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).