From: "Bhanu Prakash Gollapudi" <bprakash@broadcom.com>
To: "James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com"
<James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>,
"linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Fwd: [Open-FCoE] [PATCH 4/4] bnx2fc: Bumped version to 1.0.2
Date: Thu, 26 May 2011 23:18:25 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4DDF4231.6000503@broadcom.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4DDF352F.2020800@broadcom.com>
On 5/26/2011 10:22 PM, Bhanu Prakash Gollapudi wrote:
> Hi James,
>
> It doesnt look like the following patch set was committed. Can you
> please do so? Please let me know if you want me to re-submit.
Apparently, there will be some merge conflicts when you try to apply
these patches. I think it is better that I re-submit them. Will do it soon.
Thanks,
Bhanu
>
> Here are the links:
>
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-scsi&m=130135398425844&w=2
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-scsi&m=130135398825857&w=2
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-scsi&m=130135399825872&w=2
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-scsi&m=130135401925893&w=2
>
>
> Thanks,
> Bhanu
>
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: [Open-FCoE] [PATCH 4/4] bnx2fc: Bumped version to 1.0.2
> Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2011 16:12:57 -0700
> From: Bhanu Gollapudi<bprakash@broadcom.com>
> To: James.Bottomley@suse.de<James.Bottomley@suse.de>
> CC: devel@open-fcoe.org<devel@open-fcoe.org>,
> linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>
>
> Signed-off-by: Bhanu Prakash Gollapudi<bprakash@broadcom.com>
> ---
> drivers/scsi/bnx2fc/bnx2fc.h | 2 +-
> drivers/scsi/bnx2fc/bnx2fc_fcoe.c | 2 +-
> 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/bnx2fc/bnx2fc.h b/drivers/scsi/bnx2fc/bnx2fc.h
> index e9cfda3..24102e8 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/bnx2fc/bnx2fc.h
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/bnx2fc/bnx2fc.h
> @@ -62,7 +62,7 @@
> #include "bnx2fc_constants.h"
>
> #define BNX2FC_NAME "bnx2fc"
> -#define BNX2FC_VERSION "1.0.1"
> +#define BNX2FC_VERSION "1.0.2"
>
> #define PFX "bnx2fc: "
>
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/bnx2fc/bnx2fc_fcoe.c
> b/drivers/scsi/bnx2fc/bnx2fc_fcoe.c
> index 41456c5..8fb9b6e 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/bnx2fc/bnx2fc_fcoe.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/bnx2fc/bnx2fc_fcoe.c
> @@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct bnx2fc_percpu_s, bnx2fc_percpu);
>
> #define DRV_MODULE_NAME "bnx2fc"
> #define DRV_MODULE_VERSION BNX2FC_VERSION
> -#define DRV_MODULE_RELDATE "Mar 17, 2011"
> +#define DRV_MODULE_RELDATE "Mar 28, 2011"
>
>
> static char version[] __devinitdata =
prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-05-27 6:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-05-27 5:22 Fwd: [Open-FCoE] [PATCH 4/4] bnx2fc: Bumped version to 1.0.2 Bhanu Prakash Gollapudi
2011-05-27 6:18 ` Bhanu Prakash Gollapudi [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4DDF4231.6000503@broadcom.com \
--to=bprakash@broadcom.com \
--cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).