public inbox for linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
To: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>,
	dmilburn@redhat.com, jack_wang@usish.com,
	Jeff Skirvin <jeffrey.d.skirvin@intel.com>,
	yuxiangl@marvell.com, hch@lst.de
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] isci: filter broadcast change notifications during SMP phy resets
Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2011 16:34:20 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E0894EC.2010509@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110624194109.26706.58553.stgit@localhost6.localdomain6>

On 06/24/2011 09:48 PM, Dan Williams wrote:
> From: Jeff Skirvin<jeffrey.d.skirvin@intel.com>
>
> When resetting a sata device in the domain we have seen occasions where
> libsas prematurely marks a device gone in the time it takes for the
> device to re-establish the link.  This plays badly with software raid
> arrays.  Other libsas drivers have non-uniform delays in their reset
> handlers to try to cover this condition, but not sufficient to close the
> hole.  Given that a sata device can take many seconds to recover we
> filter bcns and poll for the device reattach state before notifying
> libsas that the port needs the domain to be rediscovered.  Once this has
> been proven out at the lldd level we can think about uplevelling this
> feature to a common implementation in libsas.
>
That's the second time something like this have come up now.
Wouldn't it makes sense to implement something like the dev_loss_tmo 
mechanism with have for FC? That should cover this situation nicely ...

Cheers,

Hannes
-- 
Dr. Hannes Reinecke		      zSeries & Storage
hare@suse.de			      +49 911 74053 688
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg
GF: J. Hawn, J. Guild, F. Imendörffer, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

  reply	other threads:[~2011-06-27 14:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-06-24 19:48 [RFC PATCH] isci: filter broadcast change notifications during SMP phy resets Dan Williams
2011-06-27 14:34 ` Hannes Reinecke [this message]
2011-06-27 14:49   ` Brian King
2011-06-27 15:59   ` Douglas Gilbert
2011-06-27 16:27     ` Dan Williams
2011-06-27 16:02   ` James Bottomley

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4E0894EC.2010509@suse.de \
    --to=hare@suse.de \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=dave.jiang@intel.com \
    --cc=dmilburn@redhat.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=jack_wang@usish.com \
    --cc=jeffrey.d.skirvin@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=yuxiangl@marvell.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox