From: "Prof. Dr. Klaus Kusche" <klaus.kusche@computerix.info>
To: Ric Wheeler <ricwheeler@gmail.com>
Cc: dgilbert@interlog.com, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Good SAS adapters for 6 Gb/s SATA SSD's (with TRIM)?
Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2011 10:48:37 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E44E8E5.4040707@computerix.info> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4E44E13B.2050503@gmail.com>
On 2011-08-12 10:15, Ric Wheeler wrote:
> On 08/12/2011 09:04 AM, Prof. Dr. Klaus Kusche wrote:
>> On 2011-08-12 05:19, Douglas Gilbert wrote:
>>> On 11-08-11 03:59 PM, Douglas Gilbert wrote:
>>>> On 11-08-11 11:18 AM, Prof. Dr. Klaus Kusche wrote:
>>>>> I'm looking for ways to hook up fast 6 Gb/s SATA SSD's (non-RAID!)
>>>>> to (server or i-X58) mainboards which do not have native 6 Gb/s SATA.
>>>>>
>>>>> From the reviews I've read so far, two things became obvious:
>>>>> * The SSD's I'm looking at really want a working SATA TRIM command.
>>>>> * All the onboard Marvell 88SE9128 (or ASmedia) solutions
>>>>> seriuosly lack performance, as do PCIe cards based on those chips.
>>>>>
>>>>> So basically, there seem to be two choices:
>>>>> 1.) LSI 2008
>>>>> 2.) Marvell 9485
>>>>>
>>>>> 1.) seems to be fast, reliable and well-supported,
>>>>> but as far as I can tell, it doesn't support TRIM at all:
>>>>> It neither maps SCSI unmap to SATA TRIM,
>>>>> nor accepts TRIM as a SATA passthrough command.
>>>>>
>>>>> Is that true?
>>>>
>>>> What counts in Linux for "trim" support on a SSD (SATA,
>>>> SAS or FC) is correctly processing the SCSI WRITE SAME (16)
>>>> with the UNMAP bit set. In the case of a SATA SSD, a SCSI
>>>> to ATA Translation Layer (SATL) should map that SCSI WRITE
>>>> SAME (16) with the UNMAP bit set to the ATA DATA SET
>>>> MANAGEMENT command with the TRIM attribute set.
>>>>
>>>> Many Linux SATA low level drivers use libata which
>>>> implements the above mapping. However some SAS HBAs
>>>> (e.g. LSI MPT Fusion 3 and 6 Gbps) implement the SATL
>>>> in their own HBA firmware.
>>>>
>>>> I tested a LSI SAS 9212-4i4e HBA running its most recent
>>>> firmware (9.0 from Feb 26, 2011) with a Intel SSDSA2M080
>>>> which does support trim. I used my ddpt utility and the
>>>> SCSI WRITE SAME (16) with the UNMAP bit set was rejected
>>>> as an "illegal request". With the UNMAP bit clear it
>>>> accepted the command. I also checked the SCSI UNMAP
>>>> command and it was also rejected.
>>>>
>>>> LSI have some more work to do on their firmware.
>>>
>>> I did check the LSI support page for my HBA just before sending
>>> my original reply. And the version 9 firmware was showing at the
>>> top of the list. Alas, that page had been alpha sorted on the
>>> file names so that version 10 of the firmware (May 2011) was
>>> hiding further down the page :-)
>>>
>>> So I installed the newest firmware and redid the above tests.
>>> Now the SCSI WRITE SAME (16) with the UNMAP bit set works on
>>> that SSD. The SCSI UNMAP command was rejected and I did not
>>> test sending the ATA DATA SET MANAGEMENT command through
>>> the pass-through (but I expect that would work).
>>>
>>> So Linux file systems will be able "discard" (="unmap"(SCSI);
>>> ="trim"(ATA)) data using LSI HBAs based the LSI 2008 chip
>>> which are running recent firmware.
>>
>> Was that with the RAID or the non-RAID firmware?
>>
>> I've asked LSI sales/support about UNMAP/TRIM being supported.
>> They've opened a case, but I got zero response up to now.
>> So it doesn't seem to be on the official feature list,
>> and it seems to be unknown at least in the Munich LSI office.
>>
>> Am I correct that this would support online trimming (mount discard),
>> but not batch trimming with wiper.sh or similar tools/scripts,
>> because they issue TRIM or UNMAP directly, not WRITE SAME UNMAP?
>> (what's the SCSI equivalent to the wiper.sh script?)
>>
>> Nobody having any info's about Marvell / mvsas?
>>
>> Klaus.
>>
>
> Discard issues the same SCSI command regardless of the online versus
> batch operation. If one works, the other should work as well.
I don't think so. wiper.sh/hdparm issue an ATA DSM TRIM as a
passthrough command in believe, not a WRITE SAME UNMAP.
And I've seen scripts doing the same as wiper.sh for SCSI
by calling the sg_unmap utility, which results in UNMAP,
not WRITE SAME UNMAP.
Klaus.
--
Prof. Dr. Klaus Kusche
Private address: Rainstraße 9/1, 88316 Isny, Germany
+49 7562 6211377 Klaus.Kusche@computerix.info http://www.computerix.info
Office address: NTA Isny gGmbH, Seidenstraße 12-35, 88316 Isny, Germany
+49 7562 9707 36 kusche@nta-isny.de http://www.nta-isny.de
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-08-12 8:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-08-11 15:18 Good SAS adapters for 6 Gb/s SATA SSD's (with TRIM)? Prof. Dr. Klaus Kusche
2011-08-11 19:59 ` Douglas Gilbert
2011-08-12 3:19 ` Douglas Gilbert
2011-08-12 7:16 ` Stefan /*St0fF*/ Hübner
2011-08-12 13:42 ` Douglas Gilbert
2011-08-14 19:59 ` Stefan Hübner
2011-08-12 8:04 ` Prof. Dr. Klaus Kusche
2011-08-12 8:15 ` Ric Wheeler
2011-08-12 8:48 ` Prof. Dr. Klaus Kusche [this message]
2011-08-12 9:01 ` Ric Wheeler
2011-08-12 9:24 ` Prof. Dr. Klaus Kusche
2011-08-12 9:35 ` Ric Wheeler
2011-08-12 11:14 ` Lukas Czerner
2011-08-12 9:52 ` Lukas Czerner
2011-08-12 12:32 ` Mark Lord
2011-08-12 9:17 ` Artem Bokhan
2011-08-12 9:34 ` Artem Bokhan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4E44E8E5.4040707@computerix.info \
--to=klaus.kusche@computerix.info \
--cc=dgilbert@interlog.com \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ricwheeler@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox