From: Benjamin ESTRABAUD <be@mpstor.com>
To: "linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Brian Caball <bc@mpstor.com>
Subject: mpt2sas: /sysfs sas_address entries do not show individual port sas addresses.
Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2011 11:42:12 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E4B9B04.10302@mpstor.com> (raw)
Hi,
I am seing a bug with the mpt2sas driver from the "Release 2.6.35.11"
kernel (commit d6c90f5b218c1ddf1496045e3939b1c960c7cb9f, tag v2.6.35.11,
long term support kernel).
I have a system that has both a LSI 1068e B3 (3G) based HBA (a SAS3801E)
as well as a LSI SAS 2008 03 (6G) HBA (a SAS9200-8e). They both work as
expected, but I am seeing a major difference in their respective /sysfs
structure, especially regarding their phy's "sas_address" field, which
seems to be a bug.
The 3G HBA's SAS addresses are associated to a specific port in sysfs,
while the 6G one are associated to the actual HBA.
The 3G HBA is configured to have two wide ports, made up of 4 phys each,
port 0 and port 1, and same configuration applies for the 6G HBA.
The ports are not in "auto" nor in narrow.
There are only two enabled ports on each HBA.
I get the following sysfs entries regarding the 3G one:
# cat
/sys/class/sas_host/host5/device/phy-5\:0/sas_phy\:phy-5\:0/sas_address
0x50015b2a2000060f
# cat
/sys/class/sas_host/host5/device/phy-5\:1/sas_phy\:phy-5\:1/sas_address
0x50015b2a2000060f
# cat
/sys/class/sas_host/host5/device/phy-5\:2/sas_phy\:phy-5\:2/sas_address
0x50015b2a2000060f
# cat
/sys/class/sas_host/host5/device/phy-5\:3/sas_phy\:phy-5\:3/sas_address
0x50015b2a2000060f
# cat
/sys/class/sas_host/host5/device/phy-5\:4/sas_phy\:phy-5\:4/sas_address
0x50015b2a20000613
# cat
/sys/class/sas_host/host5/device/phy-5\:5/sas_phy\:phy-5\:5/sas_address
0x50015b2a20000613
# cat
/sys/class/sas_host/host5/device/phy-5\:6/sas_phy\:phy-5\:6/sas_address
0x50015b2a20000613
# cat
/sys/class/sas_host/host5/device/phy-5\:7/sas_phy\:phy-5\:7/sas_address
0x50015b2a20000613
And these ones on the 6G:
# cat
/sys/class/sas_host/host0/device/phy-0\:0/sas_phy\:phy-0\:0/sas_address
0x500605b002c99150
# cat
/sys/class/sas_host/host0/device/phy-0\:1/sas_phy\:phy-0\:1/sas_address
0x500605b002c99150
# cat
/sys/class/sas_host/host0/device/phy-0\:2/sas_phy\:phy-0\:2/sas_address
0x500605b002c99150
# cat
/sys/class/sas_host/host0/device/phy-0\:3/sas_phy\:phy-0\:3/sas_address
0x500605b002c99150
# cat
/sys/class/sas_host/host0/device/phy-0\:4/sas_phy\:phy-0\:4/sas_address
0x500605b002c99150
# cat
/sys/class/sas_host/host0/device/phy-0\:5/sas_phy\:phy-0\:5/sas_address
0x500605b002c99150
# cat
/sys/class/sas_host/host0/device/phy-0\:6/sas_phy\:phy-0\:6/sas_address
0x500605b002c99150
# cat
/sys/class/sas_host/host0/device/phy-0\:7/sas_phy\:phy-0\:7/sas_address
0x500605b002c99150
As we can see above, the 3G HBA's phy "sas_address" sysfs entry displays
correct information: A single SAS address for phy 0-3 and a single one
for phy 4-7.
As we can also see using LSIUtil, each phy is numbered from a base
address and incremented.
Also, the port sas address corresponds to the address of the starting
phy of the port.
Port0's sas address is "0x50015b2a2000060f", which corresponds to the
HBA's phy0 sas address.
Port1's sas address is "0x50015b2a20000613" which corresponds to the
HBA's phy3 sas address, the starting phys for each of these ports.
Output of menu "16" from LSIUtil on the 3G HBA (1068e):
B___T SASAddress PhyNum Handle Parent Type
50015b2a2000060f 0001 SAS Initiator
50015b2a20000610 0002 SAS Initiator
50015b2a20000611 0003 SAS Initiator
50015b2a20000612 0004 SAS Initiator
50015b2a20000613 0005 SAS Initiator
50015b2a20000614 0006 SAS Initiator
50015b2a20000615 0007 SAS Initiator
50015b2a20000616 0008 SAS Initiator
However, when looking at the 6G HBA's sysfs information above, we can
see that all phy's SAS address are identical, like if there was a single
port made up of the entire 8 phys from the HBA.
When looking at LSIUtil below, we get more strangeness, where all phys
have exactly the same SAS address:
Output of menu "16" from LSIUtil on the 6G HBA (2008):
B___T SASAddress PhyNum Handle Parent Type
500605b002c99150 0001 SAS Initiator
500605b002c99150 0002 SAS Initiator
500605b002c99150 0003 SAS Initiator
500605b002c99150 0004 SAS Initiator
500605b002c99150 0005 SAS Initiator
500605b002c99150 0006 SAS Initiator
500605b002c99150 0007 SAS Initiator
500605b002c99150 0008 SAS Initiator
But looking at LSIUtil's menu "13" on the 6G HBA proves that we indeed
have 2 ports on that HBA:
PhyNum Link MinRate MaxRate Initiator Target Port
0 Enabled 1.5 6.0 Enabled Disabled 0
1 Enabled 1.5 6.0 Enabled Disabled 0
2 Enabled 1.5 6.0 Enabled Disabled 0
3 Enabled 1.5 6.0 Enabled Disabled 0
4 Enabled 1.5 6.0 Enabled Disabled 1
5 Enabled 1.5 6.0 Enabled Disabled 1
6 Enabled 1.5 6.0 Enabled Disabled 1
7 Enabled 1.5 6.0 Enabled Disabled 1
Somehow, on the 6G HBA using mpt2sas, all phys from a HBA seem to have
the same SAS address, and all ports on that HBA, whether narrow (1Phy)
or wide (4Phys), will seemingly have the same SAS address.
This is causing a good few issues with our system scripting, as we
relied on SAS addresses to identify ports.
I searched on Google extensively before posting and couldn't find any
mention of this issue.
Is this a known issue? If so, will this be resolved in a later version
of the driver?
Thanks a lot in advance for your reply.
Regards,
Ben.
next reply other threads:[~2011-08-17 10:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-08-17 10:42 Benjamin ESTRABAUD [this message]
2011-08-17 15:35 ` mpt2sas: /sysfs sas_address entries do not show individual port sas addresses Douglas Gilbert
2011-08-17 15:50 ` Benjamin ESTRABAUD
2011-08-18 17:57 ` Ravi Shankar
2011-08-18 19:52 ` Douglas Gilbert
2011-08-19 12:30 ` Benjamin ESTRABAUD
2011-08-19 14:58 ` Douglas Gilbert
2011-08-19 17:49 ` Benjamin ESTRABAUD
2011-08-19 19:06 ` Ravi Shankar
2011-08-21 1:05 ` Douglas Gilbert
2011-08-23 19:39 ` Ravi Shankar
2011-08-24 14:12 ` Benjamin ESTRABAUD
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4E4B9B04.10302@mpstor.com \
--to=be@mpstor.com \
--cc=bc@mpstor.com \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox