linux-scsi.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>,
	James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@parallels.com>,
	"linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] block: Free queue resources at blk_release_queue()
Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2011 08:08:21 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E832A55.30709@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1317183038.17578.9.camel@dabdike.hansenpartnership.com>

On 2011-09-27 22:10, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-09-27 at 18:59 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 6:15 PM, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> But if you forward the actual patch to me (the one I see on lkml seems
>>>> to be broken and doesn't compile cleanly because it's assiging a
>>>> structure to a pointer), I'll try it out anyway.
>>>
>>> Thanks, that would be great. It's inlined below.
>>
>> Well, I did several USB eject events, and nothing bad happened.
>>
>> But as mentioned, I don't think that means much. Have you tried this
>> with slub debugging and poisoning? It might be worth some extra
>> testing that way.
> 
> I've been testing a simpler version:
> 
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=131300594629839
> 
> For a long time now with great success.  The only difference is the
> locking cleanup, but SCSI doesn't need that since it doesn't supply its
> own lock, so I've been voting for this as the final fix for a while now.

The locking cleanup looks good, though, for devices that do use the
embedded lock. But functionally they should be the same for SCSI, so if
you had great success with it, then that's a good data point.

-- 
Jens Axboe

  reply	other threads:[~2011-09-28 14:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 61+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-09-22 13:18 [PATCH] block: Free queue resources at blk_release_queue() Hannes Reinecke
2011-09-28  0:47 ` Jens Axboe
2011-09-28  0:55   ` Linus Torvalds
2011-09-28  1:15     ` Jens Axboe
2011-09-28  1:59       ` Linus Torvalds
2011-09-28  2:02         ` Jens Axboe
2011-09-28  4:10         ` James Bottomley
2011-09-28 14:08           ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2011-09-28 14:11             ` James Bottomley
2011-09-28 14:14               ` [GIT PULL] Queue free fix (was Re: [PATCH] block: Free queue resources at blk_release_queue()) Jens Axboe
2011-09-28 15:22                 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-09-28 15:43                   ` James Bottomley
2011-09-28 17:48                     ` Vivek Goyal
2011-09-28 17:53                       ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-09-28 18:09                         ` Vivek Goyal
2011-09-28 18:16                           ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-09-28 19:05                             ` Eric Seppanen
2011-09-28 19:14                               ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-11-30 10:18                               ` Jens Axboe
2011-11-30 10:26                                 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-09-28 22:34                             ` Vivek Goyal
2011-09-28 17:59                       ` James Bottomley
2011-10-13 13:09                 ` Steffen Maier
2011-10-14 16:03                   ` James Bottomley
2011-10-17  8:46                     ` Jun'ichi Nomura
2011-10-17 14:06                       ` James Bottomley
2011-10-18 13:31                         ` Jun'ichi Nomura
2011-10-18 15:45                           ` Heiko Carstens
2011-10-18 16:29                             ` James Bottomley
2011-10-31 10:05                               ` Heiko Carstens
2011-10-31 10:42                                 ` James Bottomley
2011-10-31 11:46                                   ` Jun'ichi Nomura
2011-10-31 13:00                                     ` Heiko Carstens
2011-11-02 12:37                                       ` Jun'ichi Nomura
2011-11-02 12:44                                         ` Hannes Reinecke
2011-11-02 13:47                                         ` Heiko Carstens
2011-11-04  4:07                                           ` Jun'ichi Nomura
2011-11-04  9:12                                             ` Heiko Carstens
2011-11-03 18:25                                       ` Mike Snitzer
2011-11-04  9:19                                         ` Heiko Carstens
2011-11-04 13:30                                           ` Mike Snitzer
2011-11-04 13:37                                             ` Hannes Reinecke
2011-11-07 11:31                                             ` Jun'ichi Nomura
2011-11-07 13:42                                               ` Mike Snitzer
2011-11-07 12:23                                             ` Heiko Carstens
2011-11-07 11:30                                           ` Jun'ichi Nomura
2011-11-07 15:36                                             ` Mike Snitzer
2011-11-07 16:43                                               ` Heiko Carstens
2011-11-07 17:10                                               ` Mike Snitzer
2011-11-07 21:44                                                 ` Mike Snitzer
2011-11-09  9:37                                           ` Hannes Reinecke
2011-11-10 16:10                                             ` Heiko Carstens
2011-11-17 16:29                                               ` Mike Snitzer
2011-11-29 12:00                                                 ` Heiko Carstens
2011-11-29 20:18                                                   ` Mike Snitzer
2011-11-30  7:25                                                     ` Hannes Reinecke
2011-12-12 12:39                                                     ` Heiko Carstens
2011-12-13 16:50                                                       ` Mike Snitzer
2011-10-31 13:21                                   ` Mike Snitzer
2011-10-31 13:40                                     ` Heiko Carstens
2011-10-31 14:01                                       ` Mike Snitzer

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4E832A55.30709@kernel.dk \
    --to=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com \
    --cc=James.Bottomley@parallels.com \
    --cc=hare@suse.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).