From: Rob Evers <revers@redhat.com>
To: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] delay transition requeues for 2 seconds - alua
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2012 12:03:09 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F0F124D.3000708@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4F0EAB53.7020404@suse.de>
On 01/12/2012 04:43 AM, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> On 01/03/2012 08:20 PM, Rob Evers wrote:
>> From: Rob Evers<revers@redhat.com>
>>
>> When alua targets are transitioning, the scsi midlayer retry mechanism
>> continuously retries the scsi commands that are returning with not ready
>> transitioning status. The target is not capable of handling the
>> commands for time on the order of several seconds during these transistions.
>>
>> This patch delays the device queue for 2 seconds, which is in the same
>> order of aas transition time.
>>
>> Also, handle all other cases where ADD_TO_MLQUEUE_DELAY could be returned
>> instead of ADD_TO_MLQUEUE as if ADD_TO_MLQUEUE were being returned.
>>
>> Problem found by array partner testing
>>
>> change MLQUEUE_DEV_DLY_RTY to MLQUEUE_DELAYED_RETRY
>>
> I have been working on a different solution, whic
>> Signed-off-by: Rob Evers<revers@redhat.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/scsi/device_handler/scsi_dh_alua.c | 7 ++++---
>> drivers/scsi/scsi.c | 3 +++
>> drivers/scsi/scsi_error.c | 1 +
>> drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c | 9 ++++++++-
>> include/scsi/scsi.h | 12 +++++++-----
>> 5 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/device_handler/scsi_dh_alua.c b/drivers/scsi/device_handler/scsi_dh_alua.c
>> index 4ef0212..33b8df7 100644
>> --- a/drivers/scsi/device_handler/scsi_dh_alua.c
>> +++ b/drivers/scsi/device_handler/scsi_dh_alua.c
>> @@ -233,7 +233,7 @@ static void stpg_endio(struct request *req, int error)
>> goto done;
>> }
>> err = alua_check_sense(h->sdev,&sense_hdr);
>> - if (err == ADD_TO_MLQUEUE) {
>> + if (err == ADD_TO_MLQUEUE || err == ADD_TO_MLQUEUE_DELAY) {
>> err = SCSI_DH_RETRY;
>> goto done;
>> }
>> @@ -443,7 +443,7 @@ static int alua_check_sense(struct scsi_device *sdev,
>> /*
>> * LUN Not Accessible - ALUA state transition
>> */
>> - return ADD_TO_MLQUEUE;
>> + return ADD_TO_MLQUEUE_DELAY;
>> if (sense_hdr->asc == 0x04&& sense_hdr->ascq == 0x0b)
>> /*
>> * LUN Not Accessible -- Target port in standby state
>> @@ -521,7 +521,8 @@ static int alua_rtpg(struct scsi_device *sdev, struct alua_dh_data *h)
>> return SCSI_DH_IO;
>>
>> err = alua_check_sense(sdev,&sense_hdr);
>> - if (err == ADD_TO_MLQUEUE&& time_before(jiffies, expiry))
>> + if ((err == ADD_TO_MLQUEUE || err == ADD_TO_MLQUEUE_DELAY)&&
>> + time_before(jiffies, expiry))
>> goto retry;
>> sdev_printk(KERN_INFO, sdev,
>> "%s: rtpg sense code %02x/%02x/%02x\n",
> Actually, this doesn't help if the RTPG command returns with the
> mentioned error; then you'll just continue flooding the array with
> RTPG commands. You'll need to delay the RTPG commands, too.
I thought that the rtpg command would get requeued into the
device queue that is being delayed anyway.
Isn't that true?
Rob
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-01-12 17:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-01-03 19:20 [PATCH] delay transition requeues for 2 seconds - alua Rob Evers
2012-01-07 15:06 ` Rob Evers
2012-04-25 22:16 ` Rob Evers
2012-01-12 9:43 ` Hannes Reinecke
2012-01-12 17:03 ` Rob Evers [this message]
2012-01-12 21:23 ` Hannes Reinecke
2012-01-12 19:54 ` Mike Christie
2012-01-12 19:59 ` Mike Christie
2012-01-12 22:13 ` Hannes Reinecke
2012-01-13 17:51 ` Rob Evers
2012-02-10 20:04 ` Rob Evers
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-12-13 22:40 Rob Evers
2011-12-20 15:41 ` Hannes Reinecke
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4F0F124D.3000708@redhat.com \
--to=revers@redhat.com \
--cc=hare@suse.de \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).