From: "Christopher R. Hertel" <crh@samba.org>
To: Ric Wheeler <rwheeler@redhat.com>
Cc: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>,
Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
"linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>, Simo Sorce <simo@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [LSF/MM TOPIC][ATTEND] linux servers as a storage server - what's missing?
Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2012 14:25:39 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F206543.60309@samba.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4F1F3B00.8060603@redhat.com>
I have actually been mulling this over a good deal in my mind, but I keep
approaching it from different perspectives.
Here are some random questions that pop up in my mind...
Can we put FibreChannel HBAs in *target* mode into a Linux-based PC and
export LUNs via FibreChannel?
- Do we support multipath in this configuration?
- Zoning? Muli-access LUNs for Clustering?
Where are we on FCoE support?
Where to we stand on ATAoE?
- Coraid, the creaters of ATAoE, were recently listed 3rd on a
"Most Promising Storage Start-Ups in 2012" list[1].
- ATAoE support has been standard in Linux for years.
- The target software is very low-level. It needs an overhaul
and a powerful configuration API.
What about other block-level protocols? My familiarity with these varies.
Chris -)-----
[1]http://www.storagenewsletter.com/news/startups/most-promising-storage-start-ups
Ric Wheeler wrote:
> On 01/24/2012 04:36 PM, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
>> On Tue, Jan 03, 2012 at 02:26:09PM -0500, Jeff Layton wrote:
>>> On Wed, 21 Dec 2011 10:59:43 -0500
>>> Ric Wheeler<rwheeler@redhat.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> One common thing that I see a lot of these days is an increasing
>>>> number of
>>>> platforms that are built on our stack as storage servers. Ranging
>>>> from the
>>>> common linux based storage/NAS devices up to various distributed
>>>> systems.
>>>> Almost all of them use our common stack - software RAID, LVM,
>>>> XFS/ext4 and samba.
>>>>
>>>> At last year's SNIA developers conference, it was clear that
>>>> Microsoft is
>>>> putting a lot of effort into enhancing windows 8 server as a storage
>>>> server with
>>>> both support for a pNFS server and of course SMB. I think that linux
>>>> (+samba) is
>>>> ahead of the windows based storage appliances today, but they are
>>>> putting
>>>> together a very aggressive list of features.
>>>>
>>>> I think that it would be useful and interesting to take a slot at
>>>> this year's
>>>> LSF to see how we are doing in this space. How large do we need to
>>>> scale for an
>>>> appliance? What kind of work is needed (support for the copy
>>>> offload system
>>>> call? better support for out of band notifications like those used
>>>> in "thinly
>>>> provisioned" SCSI devices? management API's? Ease of use CLI work?
>>>> SMB2.2 support?).
>>>>
>>>> The goal would be to see what technical gaps we have that need more
>>>> active
>>>> development in, not just a wish list :)
>>>>
>>>> Ric
>>> Unfortunately, w/o a wishlist of sorts, it's hard to know what needs
>>> more active development ;).
>>>
>>> While HCH will probably disagree, being able to support more
>>> NFSv4/Windows API features at the VFS layer would make it a lot easier
>>> to do a more unified serving appliance. Right now, both knfsd and samba
>>> track too much info internally, and that makes it very difficult to
>>> serve the same data via multiple protocols.
>> By the way, we could really use a
>> Windows/Samba expert if we're going to discuss that.
>>
>> I don't think their list(s) got the announcement?
>>
>> --b.
>
> Adding in three windows/samba people that I know of :)
>
> Ric
>
>>> Off the top of my head, my "wishlist" for better NFSv4 serving would be:
>>>
>>> - RichACLs
>>> - Share/Deny mode support on open
>>> - mandatory locking that doesn't rely on weirdo file modes
>>>
>>> It's always going to be hard for us to compete with dedicated
>>> appliances. Where Linux can shine though is in allowing for more
>>> innovative combinations.
>>>
>>> Being able to do active/active NFS serving from clustered filesystems,
>>> for instance is something that we can eventually attain but that would
>>> be harder to do in an appliance. This sort of discussion might also
>>> dovetail with Benny's proposal about pNFS serving.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Jeff Layton<jlayton@redhat.com>
>>> --
>>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe
>>> linux-fsdevel" in
>>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
--
"Implementing CIFS - the Common Internet FileSystem" ISBN: 013047116X
Samba Team -- http://www.samba.org/ -)----- Christopher R. Hertel
jCIFS Team -- http://jcifs.samba.org/ -)----- ubiqx development, uninq.
ubiqx Team -- http://www.ubiqx.org/ -)----- crh@ubiqx.mn.org
OnLineBook -- http://ubiqx.org/cifs/ -)----- crh@ubiqx.org
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-01-25 20:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-12-21 15:59 [LSF/MM TOPIC] linux servers as a storage server - what's missing? Ric Wheeler
2011-12-22 8:14 ` Shyam_Iyer
2011-12-22 15:58 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-12-22 20:54 ` Shyam_Iyer
2011-12-23 3:06 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-12-23 4:35 ` Shyam_Iyer
2012-01-09 12:18 ` Hannes Reinecke
2012-01-09 12:59 ` Tom Coughlan
2012-01-10 6:53 ` Ric Wheeler
2012-01-20 8:55 ` Hannes Reinecke
2012-01-19 16:17 ` [LSF/MM TOPIC] linux servers as a storage server - what'smissing? Loke, Chetan
2012-01-19 16:19 ` Ric Wheeler
2012-01-19 16:26 ` Loke, Chetan
2012-01-19 16:29 ` Ric Wheeler
2012-01-19 17:32 ` Loke, Chetan
2012-01-19 17:44 ` Ric Wheeler
2012-01-19 21:30 ` Loke, Chetan
2012-01-19 21:39 ` Ric Wheeler
2012-01-24 17:05 ` Loke, Chetan
2012-01-24 18:13 ` Ric Wheeler
2012-01-26 22:24 ` Dave Chinner
2012-01-26 22:29 ` Ric Wheeler
2012-01-03 19:26 ` [LSF/MM TOPIC][ATTEND] linux servers as a storage server - what's missing? Jeff Layton
2012-01-03 19:32 ` Chuck Lever
2012-01-17 21:16 ` J. Bruce Fields
2012-01-17 21:25 ` Chuck Lever
2012-01-24 21:36 ` J. Bruce Fields
2012-01-24 23:13 ` Ric Wheeler
2012-01-25 19:05 ` Christopher R. Hertel
2012-01-25 20:25 ` Christopher R. Hertel [this message]
2012-01-25 21:56 ` Roland Dreier
2012-01-25 22:09 ` Christopher R. Hertel
2012-01-26 21:52 ` Andy Grover
2012-01-26 11:15 ` Bart Van Assche
2012-01-18 17:00 ` [LSF/MM TOPIC] " Roland Dreier
2012-01-18 17:51 ` Ric Wheeler
2012-01-18 18:46 ` Roland Dreier
2012-01-18 18:51 ` Bart Van Assche
2012-01-18 19:00 ` Roland Dreier
2012-01-19 8:16 ` Rolf Eike Beer
2012-01-19 17:50 ` Loke, Chetan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4F206543.60309@samba.org \
--to=crh@samba.org \
--cc=bfields@fieldses.org \
--cc=jlayton@redhat.com \
--cc=jra@samba.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rwheeler@redhat.com \
--cc=simo@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).