From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
To: Tomas Henzl <thenzl@redhat.com>
Cc: "'linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org'" <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@redhat.com>,
Mike Christie <michaelc@cs.wisc.edu>
Subject: Re: [RFC] How to fix an async scan - rmmod race?
Date: Fri, 06 Apr 2012 09:39:48 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F7EB9E4.4050205@acm.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4F7DA4F8.90104@redhat.com>
On 04/05/12 13:58, Tomas Henzl wrote:
> When the async scan is protected this way a further protection via ref. count is no more needed
> so remove it
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_scan.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_scan.c
> index 29c4c04..be9e6fe 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_scan.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_scan.c
> @@ -1743,10 +1743,9 @@ static struct async_scan_data *scsi_prep_async_scan(struct Scsi_Host *shost)
>
> data = kmalloc(sizeof(*data), GFP_KERNEL);
> if (!data)
> - goto err;
> - data->shost = scsi_host_get(shost);
> - if (!data->shost)
> - goto err;
> + return NULL;
> +
> + data->shost = shost;
> init_completion(&data->prev_finished);
>
> mutex_lock(&shost->scan_mutex);
Maybe it's better to leave the scsi_host_get() / scsi_host_put() pair in
scsi_prep_async_scan() and scsi_finish_async_scan(). Let's have a look
at the following code in scsi_finish_async_scan():
spin_lock_irqsave(shost->host_lock, flags);
shost->async_scan = 0;
spin_unlock_irqrestore(shost->host_lock, flags);
If the context that is waiting for shost->async_scan wouldn't lock
shost->host_lock after having observed that shost->async_scan became
zero then shost->host_lock could already have been freed before
scsi_finish_async_scan() has unlocked that spin lock. Personally I
prefer to avoid having such subtle dependencies between the async
scanning code and the context waiting for it to finish.
Bart.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-04-06 9:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-04-05 13:58 [RFC] How to fix an async scan - rmmod race? Tomas Henzl
2012-04-05 15:57 ` Mike Christie
2012-04-05 16:05 ` Mike Christie
2012-04-05 18:00 ` Bart Van Assche
2012-04-05 21:29 ` Mike Christie
2012-04-06 9:24 ` Bart Van Assche
2012-04-06 17:22 ` Mike Christie
2012-04-06 18:37 ` Bart Van Assche
2012-04-11 21:46 ` Mike Christie
2012-04-06 9:54 ` Tomas Henzl
2012-04-06 15:20 ` James Bottomley
2012-04-06 16:15 ` Bart Van Assche
2012-04-06 16:35 ` James Bottomley
2012-04-06 17:01 ` Bart Van Assche
2012-04-06 17:15 ` James Bottomley
2012-04-06 17:59 ` Bart Van Assche
2012-04-08 17:38 ` Bart Van Assche
2012-04-11 18:17 ` Mike Christie
2012-04-11 18:30 ` Mike Christie
2012-04-11 19:47 ` Bart Van Assche
2012-04-11 22:28 ` Mike Christie
2012-04-12 10:48 ` Bart Van Assche
2012-04-06 9:39 ` Bart Van Assche [this message]
2012-04-06 10:14 ` Tomas Henzl
2012-04-06 13:13 ` Tomas Henzl
2012-04-06 14:38 ` Bart Van Assche
2012-04-06 15:32 ` Tomas Henzl
2012-04-12 12:48 ` [RFC] How to fix an async scan - rmmod race? try_module_get Tomas Henzl
2012-04-18 16:48 ` [RFC] How to fix an async scan - 'rmmod --wait' race? Tomas Henzl
2012-04-18 18:18 ` Bart Van Assche
2012-05-17 8:42 ` James Bottomley
2012-05-17 8:55 ` Bart Van Assche
2012-05-17 9:01 ` James Bottomley
2012-05-17 14:51 ` Tomas Henzl
2012-05-22 10:05 ` James Bottomley
2012-05-25 15:13 ` Tomas Henzl
2012-05-25 18:46 ` Dan Williams
2012-05-28 11:58 ` Tomas Henzl
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4F7EB9E4.4050205@acm.org \
--to=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=michaelc@cs.wisc.edu \
--cc=sgruszka@redhat.com \
--cc=thenzl@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).