From: Mike Christie <michaelc@cs.wisc.edu>
To: Michael Tokarev <mjt@tls.msk.ru>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>, Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>,
Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
SCSI Mailing List <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: dramatic I/O slowdown after upgrading 2.6.38->3.0+
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 12:19:43 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F85BD2F.80905@cs.wisc.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4F855173.40902@msgid.tls.msk.ru>
On 04/11/2012 04:40 AM, Michael Tokarev wrote:
> On 10.04.2012 19:13, Jan Kara wrote:
>> > On Tue 10-04-12 10:00:38, Michael Tokarev wrote:
> []
>>> >> 2.6.38:
>>> >> # dd if=/dev/sdb of=/dev/null bs=1M iflag=direct count=100
>>> >> 100+0 records in
>>> >> 100+0 records out
>>> >> 104857600 bytes (105 MB) copied, 1.73126 s, 60.6 MB/s
>>> >>
>>> >> 3.0:
>>> >> # dd if=/dev/sdb of=/dev/null bs=1M iflag=direct count=100
>>> >> 100+0 records in
>>> >> 100+0 records out
>>> >> 104857600 bytes (105 MB) copied, 29.4508 s, 3.6 MB/s
>>> >>
>>> >> That's about 20 times difference on direct read from the
>>> >> same - idle - device!!
>> > Huh, that's a huge difference for such a trivial load. So we can rule out
>> > filesystems, writeback, mm. I also wouldn't think it's IO scheduler but
>> > you can always check by comparing dd numbers after
>> > echo none >/sys/block/sdb/queue/scheduler
Did you try newer 3.X kernels or just 3.0?
We were hitting a similar problem with iscsi. Same workload and it
started with 2.6.38. I think it turned out to be this issue:
// thread with issue like what we hit:
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1244680
// Patch that I think fixed issue:
commit 3deaa7190a8da38453c4fabd9dec7f66d17fff67
Author: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com>
Date: Fri Feb 3 15:37:17 2012 -0800
readahead: fix pipeline break caused by block plug
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-04-11 17:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <4F75E46E.2000503@msgid.tls.msk.ru>
[not found] ` <20120405232913.GA6640@quack.suse.cz>
[not found] ` <4F7E74F4.90604@msgid.tls.msk.ru>
[not found] ` <20120410022628.GN18323@dastard>
[not found] ` <4F83CC86.2010805@msgid.tls.msk.ru>
[not found] ` <20120410151326.GA4936@quack.suse.cz>
2012-04-11 9:40 ` dramatic I/O slowdown after upgrading 2.6.38->3.0+ Michael Tokarev
2012-04-11 17:19 ` Mike Christie [this message]
2012-04-11 17:55 ` Michael Tokarev
2012-04-11 18:28 ` Jan Kara
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4F85BD2F.80905@cs.wisc.edu \
--to=michaelc@cs.wisc.edu \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mjt@tls.msk.ru \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox