linux-scsi.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Love, Robert W" <robert.w.love@intel.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: "linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
	"devel@open-fcoe.org" <devel@open-fcoe.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fcoe: Remove redundant 'less than zero' check
Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2012 23:50:07 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FFB6E2D.7010506@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120709162939.9d0481e7.akpm@linux-foundation.org>

On 12-07-09 04:29 PM, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Thu, 05 Jul 2012 07:52:25 -0700
> Robert Love<robert.w.love@intel.com>  wrote:
>
>> strtoul returns an 'unsigned long' so there is no
>> reason to check if the value is less than zero.
>>
>> strtoul already checks for the '-' character deep
>> in its bowels. It will return an error if the user
>> has provided a negative value and fcoe_str_to_dev_loss
>> will return that error to its caller.
> huh, I never knew that.  So if we feed -1 to kstrtoul() it gets treated
> as an error?  That seems a bit surprising.  You're sure about that?
>
>
I believe so.

kstrtoul->kstrtoull->_kstrtoull->_parse_integer

When the call chain ultimately hits _parse_integer it breaks out of 
parsing if it hits a non-numeric or alphabetic character outside of the 
'a' to 'f' range. _kstrtoull notices that the buffer wasn't completely 
parsed and returns an error. I think the error will be -EINVAL.

//Rob

  reply	other threads:[~2012-07-09 23:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <829BE905228AE14A9AE1A46E6F2E371605538D039D@VA3DIAXVS891.RED001.local>
2012-07-03 22:27 ` New Defects based on recent changes in Kernel code found by Coverity Scan Andrew Morton
2012-07-03 23:05   ` Bing Zhao
     [not found]   ` <20120703152739.ea7df9e6.akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org>
2012-07-05 14:52     ` [PATCH] fcoe: Remove redundant 'less than zero' check Robert Love
2012-07-09 23:29       ` Andrew Morton
2012-07-09 23:50         ` Love, Robert W [this message]
2012-07-05 15:12   ` New Defects based on recent changes in Kernel code found by Coverity Scan Love, Robert W
2012-07-05 15:33   ` Chris Mason
2012-07-05 19:44     ` Andrew Morton

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4FFB6E2D.7010506@intel.com \
    --to=robert.w.love@intel.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=devel@open-fcoe.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).