Re: [PATCH v7 1/3] dt-bindings: ufs: qcom: Add ICE phandle

[Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>]

On 08/04/2023 23:40, Abel Vesa wrote:
> Starting with SM8550, the ICE will have its own devicetree node
> so add the qcom,ice property to reference it.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@linaro.org>
> ---
> 
> The v6 is here:
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230407105029.2274111-3-abel.vesa@linaro.org/
> 
> Changes since v6:
>  * Dropped the minItems for both the qcom,ice and the reg in the
>    qcom,ice compatile subschema, like Krzysztof suggested
> 
> Changes since v5:
>  * dropped the sm8550 specific subschema and replaced it with one that
>    mutually excludes the qcom,ice vs both the ICE specific reg range
>    and the ICE clock
> 
> Changes since v4:
>  * Added check for sm8550 compatible w.r.t. qcom,ice in order to enforce
>    it while making sure none of the other platforms are allowed to use it
> 
> Changes since v3:
>  * dropped the "and drop core clock" part from subject line
> 
> Changes since v2:
>  * dropped all changes except the qcom,ice property
> 
> 
>  .../devicetree/bindings/ufs/qcom,ufs.yaml     | 24 +++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 24 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ufs/qcom,ufs.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ufs/qcom,ufs.yaml
> index c5a06c048389..10d426ba1959 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ufs/qcom,ufs.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ufs/qcom,ufs.yaml
> @@ -70,6 +70,10 @@ properties:
>    power-domains:
>      maxItems: 1
>  
> +  qcom,ice:
> +    $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/phandle
> +    description: phandle to the Inline Crypto Engine node
> +
>    reg:
>      minItems: 1
>      maxItems: 2
> @@ -187,6 +191,26 @@ allOf:
>  
>      # TODO: define clock bindings for qcom,msm8994-ufshc
>  
> +  - if:
> +      properties:
> +        qcom,ice:

Un-reviewed. This is broken and was never tested. After applying this
patch, I can see many new warnings in all DTBs (so it is easy to spot
that it was not actually tested).

Your probably meant here:
  if:
    required:


Best regards,
Krzysztof