From: Lee Duncan <lduncan@suse.com>
To: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "James Bottomley" <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>,
"Kai Mäkisara" <kai.makisara@kolumbus.fi>,
"Jeff Mahoney" <jeffm@suse.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] st: remove st_mutex
Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2012 15:24:38 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <504E68A6.2070102@suse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <504E62D2.8030904@suse.com>
Please disregard this patch -- I have the meta-data wrong.
I'll resubmit.
On 09/10/2012 02:59 PM, Lee Duncan wrote:
> This patch is based on the "misc" branch of the SCSI tree
> and the 5-patch series for st sent by Jeff Mahoney 8/18/2012
> and Ack-ed by Kai on 8/20.
>
> From: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com>
>
> The st_mutex was created when the BKL was removed, and
> prevents simultaneous st_open calls. It is better to
> protect just the necessary data.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com>
> Reviewed-by: Lee Duncan <lduncan@suse.com>
> ---
> drivers/scsi/st.c | 8 ++------
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/st.c b/drivers/scsi/st.c
> index ceca095..98156a9 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/st.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/st.c
> @@ -75,7 +75,6 @@ static const char *verstr = "20101219";
> #include "st_options.h"
> #include "st.h"
>
> -static DEFINE_MUTEX(st_mutex);
> static int buffer_kbs;
> static int max_sg_segs;
> static int try_direct_io = TRY_DIRECT_IO;
> @@ -1185,7 +1184,6 @@ static int st_open(struct inode *inode, struct
> file *filp)
> int dev = TAPE_NR(inode);
> char *name;
>
> - mutex_lock(&st_mutex);
> /*
> * We really want to do nonseekable_open(inode, filp); here, but some
> * versions of tar incorrectly call lseek on tapes and bail out if that
> @@ -1194,7 +1192,6 @@ static int st_open(struct inode *inode, struct
> file *filp)
> filp->f_mode &= ~(FMODE_PREAD | FMODE_PWRITE);
>
> if (!(STp = scsi_tape_get(dev))) {
> - mutex_unlock(&st_mutex);
> return -ENXIO;
> }
>
> @@ -1205,7 +1202,6 @@ static int st_open(struct inode *inode, struct
> file *filp)
> if (STp->in_use) {
> spin_unlock(&st_use_lock);
> scsi_tape_put(STp);
> - mutex_unlock(&st_mutex);
> DEB( printk(ST_DEB_MSG "%s: Device already in use.\n", name); )
> return (-EBUSY);
> }
> @@ -1259,16 +1255,16 @@ static int st_open(struct inode *inode, struct
> file *filp)
> retval = (-EIO);
> goto err_out;
> }
> - mutex_unlock(&st_mutex);
> return 0;
>
> err_out:
> normalize_buffer(STp->buffer);
> + spin_lock(&st_use_lock);
> STp->in_use = 0;
> + spin_unlock(&st_use_lock);
> scsi_tape_put(STp);
> if (resumed)
> scsi_autopm_put_device(STp->device);
> - mutex_unlock(&st_mutex);
> return retval;
>
> }
>
--
Lee Duncan
SUSE Labs
prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-09-10 22:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-09-10 21:59 [PATCH] st: remove st_mutex Lee Duncan
2012-09-10 22:24 ` Lee Duncan [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=504E68A6.2070102@suse.com \
--to=lduncan@suse.com \
--cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com \
--cc=jeffm@suse.com \
--cc=kai.makisara@kolumbus.fi \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox