linux-scsi.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Mike Christie <michaelc@cs.wisc.edu>,
	linux-scsi <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
	James Bottomley <jbottomley@parallels.com>,
	Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, Chanho Min <chanho.min@lge.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix a use-after-free triggered by device removal
Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2012 20:27:29 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <50522591.5000900@acm.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120913165340.GX7677@google.com>

On 09/13/12 18:53, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Oh yeah, I definitely think this is something which needs to be solved
> from the block layer but I'm hoping this could cover the case Chanho
> is trying to solve too.  They're different but similar problems - you
> don't want blk_cleanup_queue() to finish while someone is executing
> inside it and you don't want anyone to enter it after
> blk_cleanup_queue() is finished, so I really think we should have
> block layer solution which fixes both problems.  That should be
> possible, right?

If I do not receive further feedback I'll start testing the patch below
(on top of the patch at the start of this thread):

[PATCH] Avoid that request_fn() gets invoked after draining the queue finished

---
 block/blk-core.c       |    4 ++++
 include/linux/blkdev.h |    2 ++
 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/block/blk-core.c b/block/blk-core.c
index a668b71..575b7c4 100644
--- a/block/blk-core.c
+++ b/block/blk-core.c
@@ -305,6 +305,9 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(blk_sync_queue);
  */
 void __blk_run_queue_uncond(struct request_queue *q)
 {
+	if (unlikely(blk_queue_drained(q)))
+		return;
+
 	q->request_fn_active++;
 	q->request_fn(q);
 	q->request_fn_active--;
@@ -532,6 +535,7 @@ void blk_cleanup_queue(struct request_queue *q)
 	blk_sync_queue(q);
 
 	spin_lock_irq(lock);
+	queue_flag_set(QUEUE_FLAG_DRAINED, q);
 	if (q->queue_lock != &q->__queue_lock)
 		q->queue_lock = &q->__queue_lock;
 	spin_unlock_irq(lock);
diff --git a/include/linux/blkdev.h b/include/linux/blkdev.h
index 132334e..ceebc39 100644
--- a/include/linux/blkdev.h
+++ b/include/linux/blkdev.h
@@ -456,6 +456,7 @@ struct request_queue {
 #define QUEUE_FLAG_ADD_RANDOM  16	/* Contributes to random pool */
 #define QUEUE_FLAG_SECDISCARD  17	/* supports SECDISCARD */
 #define QUEUE_FLAG_SAME_FORCE  18	/* force complete on same CPU */
+#define QUEUE_FLAG_DRAINED     19	/* queue tear-down finished */
 
 #define QUEUE_FLAG_DEFAULT	((1 << QUEUE_FLAG_IO_STAT) |		\
 				 (1 << QUEUE_FLAG_STACKABLE)	|	\
@@ -526,6 +527,7 @@ static inline void queue_flag_clear(unsigned int flag, struct request_queue *q)
 #define blk_queue_tagged(q)	test_bit(QUEUE_FLAG_QUEUED, &(q)->queue_flags)
 #define blk_queue_stopped(q)	test_bit(QUEUE_FLAG_STOPPED, &(q)->queue_flags)
 #define blk_queue_dead(q)	test_bit(QUEUE_FLAG_DEAD, &(q)->queue_flags)
+#define blk_queue_drained(q)	test_bit(QUEUE_FLAG_DRAINED, &(q)->queue_flags)
 #define blk_queue_bypass(q)	test_bit(QUEUE_FLAG_BYPASS, &(q)->queue_flags)
 #define blk_queue_nomerges(q)	test_bit(QUEUE_FLAG_NOMERGES, &(q)->queue_flags)
 #define blk_queue_noxmerges(q)	\
-- 
1.7.7



  reply	other threads:[~2012-09-13 18:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-09-03 14:12 [PATCH] Fix a use-after-free triggered by device removal Bart Van Assche
2012-09-06 16:27 ` Michael Christie
2012-09-06 17:58   ` Bart Van Assche
2012-09-06 18:14     ` Mike Christie
2012-09-06 18:52       ` Bart Van Assche
2012-09-06 23:20         ` Tejun Heo
2012-09-07  6:57           ` Bart Van Assche
2012-09-10 23:38             ` Tejun Heo
2012-09-11  6:42               ` Bart Van Assche
2012-09-12 20:53                 ` Tejun Heo
2012-09-13  7:26                   ` Bart Van Assche
2012-09-13 16:53                     ` Tejun Heo
2012-09-13 18:27                       ` Bart Van Assche [this message]
2012-09-13 19:25                         ` Tejun Heo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=50522591.5000900@acm.org \
    --to=bvanassche@acm.org \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=chanho.min@lge.com \
    --cc=jbottomley@parallels.com \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=michaelc@cs.wisc.edu \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).