From: Andy Grover <agrover@redhat.com>
To: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: nab@risingtidesystems.com,
Chris Friesen <chris.friesen@genband.com>,
Jon Mason <jdmason@kudzu.us>,
target-devel <target-devel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-scsi <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Marc Fleischmann <mwf@risingtidesystems.com>
Subject: Re: scsi target, likely GPL violation
Date: Fri, 09 Nov 2012 11:52:19 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <509D5EF3.9030809@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20121109110336.41833034@pyramind.ukuu.org.uk>
On 11/09/2012 03:03 AM, Alan Cox wrote:
> I fail to understand the maintainer question however. If you were trying
> to block people adding target features that competed that would be a
> different thing.
You think it's ok for us to have an unrepentant GPL violator as a
subsystem maintainer??
If that's really what you're saying then I think that's crazy.
-- Andy
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-11-09 19:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-11-07 16:50 scsi target, likely GPL violation Andy Grover
2012-11-08 1:02 ` Jon Mason
2012-11-08 1:57 ` Chris Friesen
2012-11-08 16:57 ` Andy Grover
2012-11-08 20:05 ` Nicholas A. Bellinger
2012-11-08 20:22 ` Dave Airlie
2012-11-08 21:22 ` Andy Grover
2012-11-09 2:08 ` Nicholas A. Bellinger
2012-11-09 11:03 ` Alan Cox
2012-11-09 19:52 ` Andy Grover [this message]
2012-11-09 20:26 ` Alan Cox
2012-11-11 22:13 ` Lawrence Rosen
2012-11-11 22:41 ` Julian Calaby
2012-11-11 23:03 ` Dave Airlie
2012-11-12 14:21 ` Bradley M. Kuhn
2012-11-15 18:21 ` Andy Grover
2012-11-09 23:16 ` Andy Grover
2012-11-10 23:32 ` Bradley M. Kuhn
2012-11-08 16:57 ` Andy Grover
2012-11-11 9:34 ` James Bottomley
2012-11-11 13:05 ` Theodore Ts'o
2012-11-11 15:15 ` Bradley M. Kuhn
2012-11-11 18:22 ` James Bottomley
2012-11-11 18:32 ` Alan Cox
2012-11-14 2:32 ` James Bottomley
2012-11-12 14:08 ` Theodore Ts'o
2012-11-12 14:15 ` Alan Cox
2012-11-12 0:39 ` Douglas Gilbert
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=509D5EF3.9030809@redhat.com \
--to=agrover@redhat.com \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=chris.friesen@genband.com \
--cc=jdmason@kudzu.us \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mwf@risingtidesystems.com \
--cc=nab@risingtidesystems.com \
--cc=target-devel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).