From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: "Elliott, Robert (Server Storage)" <Elliott@hp.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
"Nicholas A. Bellinger" <nab@linux-iscsi.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
target-devel <target-devel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-scsi <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] target/iblock: Add WRITE_SAME w/ UNMAP=0 emulation support
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2012 12:38:18 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <50AA1A2A.2070504@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <94D0CD8314A33A4D9D801C0FE68B40294CCF8D45@G9W0745.americas.hpqcorp.net>
Il 15/11/2012 21:01, Elliott, Robert (Server Storage) ha scritto:
> WRITE SAME always has a payload, regardless of the UNMAP bit value.
>
> For WRITE SAME with UNMAP=0, it's extremely important; that's how
> what to write is specified.
>
> For WRITE SAME with UNMAP=1, the device server is required to check
> that the payload matches the data that is returned for unmapped LBAs.
> lf LBPRZ=1 (read zeros for unmapped LBAs), that means checking that
> the payload has all zeros. In sbc3r33, this rule is tucked away in
> model section 4.7.3.4.3, not the command section 5.41.
Does that mean that LBPRZ=0, LPBWS=1 is practically an invalid
combination? Because there's no real way for the device server to
perform the check successfully.
Paolo
> I would like to change that rule (it's a nuisance and a performance
> burden), but that's the current rule going into SBC-3 letter ballot.
>
> Changing WRITE SAME with UNMAP=1 to ignore the payload would provide
> essentially the same functionality as changing the UNMAP command to
> be mandatory, not just a hint; both approaches have been discussed.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-11-19 11:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-11-08 20:07 [PATCH 0/3] target/iblock: Add WRITE_SAME w/ UNMAP=0 emulation Nicholas A. Bellinger
2012-11-08 20:07 ` [PATCH 1/3] target/sbc: Make WRITE_SAME check differentiate between UNMAP=[1,0] Nicholas A. Bellinger
2012-11-15 10:52 ` Christoph Hellwig
2012-11-08 20:07 ` [PATCH 2/3] target: Add max_write_same_len device attribute Nicholas A. Bellinger
2012-11-15 10:53 ` Christoph Hellwig
2012-11-15 19:23 ` Nicholas A. Bellinger
2012-11-16 13:05 ` Paolo Bonzini
2012-11-08 20:07 ` [PATCH 3/3] target/iblock: Add WRITE_SAME w/ UNMAP=0 emulation support Nicholas A. Bellinger
2012-11-15 11:04 ` Christoph Hellwig
2012-11-15 15:03 ` Douglas Gilbert
2012-11-15 15:25 ` Martin K. Petersen
2012-11-15 19:29 ` Nicholas A. Bellinger
2012-11-15 19:32 ` Christoph Hellwig
2012-11-15 20:01 ` Elliott, Robert (Server Storage)
2012-11-15 20:31 ` Nicholas A. Bellinger
2012-11-19 11:38 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2012-11-19 23:19 ` Elliott, Robert (Server Storage)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=50AA1A2A.2070504@redhat.com \
--to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=Elliott@hp.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=nab@linux-iscsi.org \
--cc=target-devel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).