From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
Cc: linux-scsi <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
James Bottomley <jbottomley@parallels.com>,
Mike Christie <michaelc@cs.wisc.edu>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
Chanho Min <chanho.min@lge.com>,
David Milburn <dmilburn@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH v8 02/10] Remove get_device() / put_device() pair from scsi_request_fn()
Date: Tue, 05 Feb 2013 13:46:35 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5110FF2B.2090609@acm.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5110FE98.8030209@acm.org>
Now that all scsi_request_fn() callers hold a reference on the
SCSI device that function is invoked for and since
blk_cleanup_queue() waits until scsi_request_fn() has finished
it is safe to remove the get_device() / put_device() pair from
scsi_request_fn().
Signed-off-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
Acked-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: James Bottomley <JBottomley@Parallels.com>
Cc: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
Cc: Mike Christie <michaelc@cs.wisc.edu>
---
drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c | 14 +++-----------
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
index 5c67339..db4836bc 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
@@ -1529,16 +1529,14 @@ static void scsi_softirq_done(struct request *rq)
* Lock status: IO request lock assumed to be held when called.
*/
static void scsi_request_fn(struct request_queue *q)
+ __releases(q->queue_lock)
+ __acquires(q->queue_lock)
{
struct scsi_device *sdev = q->queuedata;
struct Scsi_Host *shost;
struct scsi_cmnd *cmd;
struct request *req;
- if(!get_device(&sdev->sdev_gendev))
- /* We must be tearing the block queue down already */
- return;
-
/*
* To start with, we keep looping until the queue is empty, or until
* the host is no longer able to accept any more requests.
@@ -1627,7 +1625,7 @@ static void scsi_request_fn(struct request_queue *q)
goto out_delay;
}
- goto out;
+ return;
not_ready:
spin_unlock_irq(shost->host_lock);
@@ -1646,12 +1644,6 @@ static void scsi_request_fn(struct request_queue *q)
out_delay:
if (sdev->device_busy == 0)
blk_delay_queue(q, SCSI_QUEUE_DELAY);
-out:
- /* must be careful here...if we trigger the ->remove() function
- * we cannot be holding the q lock */
- spin_unlock_irq(q->queue_lock);
- put_device(&sdev->sdev_gendev);
- spin_lock_irq(q->queue_lock);
}
u64 scsi_calculate_bounce_limit(struct Scsi_Host *shost)
--
1.7.10.4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-02-05 12:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-02-05 12:44 [PATCH v8 0/10] More device removal fixes Bart Van Assche
2013-02-05 12:45 ` [PATCH v8 01/10] Fix race between starved list processing and device removal Bart Van Assche
2013-02-05 12:46 ` Bart Van Assche [this message]
2013-02-05 12:47 ` [PATCH v8 03/10] Introduce scsi_device_being_removed() Bart Van Assche
2013-02-05 12:47 ` [PATCH v8 04/10] Remove offline devices when removing a host Bart Van Assche
2013-02-05 12:48 ` [PATCH v8 05/10] Disallow changing the device state via sysfs into "deleted" Bart Van Assche
2013-02-05 12:49 ` [PATCH v8 06/10] Avoid saving/restoring interrupt state inside scsi_remove_host() Bart Van Assche
2013-02-05 12:49 ` [PATCH v8 07/10] Make scsi_remove_host() wait for device removal Bart Van Assche
2013-02-05 12:50 ` [PATCH v8 08/10] Make scsi_remove_host() wait until error handling finished Bart Van Assche
2013-02-05 12:51 ` [PATCH v8 09/10] Avoid that scsi_device_set_state() triggers a race Bart Van Assche
2013-02-05 12:51 ` [PATCH v8 10/10] Save and restore host_scribble during error handling Bart Van Assche
2013-02-06 22:31 ` [PATCH v8 0/10] More device removal fixes Joe Lawrence
2013-02-07 10:40 ` Bart Van Assche
2013-02-07 11:33 ` Bart Van Assche
2013-02-08 23:29 ` Joe Lawrence
2013-02-09 9:28 ` Bart Van Assche
2013-02-11 20:36 ` Bart Van Assche
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5110FF2B.2090609@acm.org \
--to=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=chanho.min@lge.com \
--cc=dmilburn@redhat.com \
--cc=jbottomley@parallels.com \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=michaelc@cs.wisc.edu \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).