From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
To: 'James Bottomley' <jbottomley@parallels.com>
Cc: Chanho Min <chanho.min@lge.com>,
'linux-scsi' <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 1/9] Fix race between starved list processing and device removal
Date: Sat, 09 Feb 2013 16:06:39 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <511665FF.8090408@acm.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <034101cdee08$2d67f870$8837e950$@min@lge.com>
Hello James,
Please consider this patch for inclusion in kernel 3.9.
Thanks,
Bart.
On 01/09/13 02:25, Chanho Min wrote:
> Is there any progress in this patch?
> Oops is still occurred from a torn down device due to this cause.
> We look forward to this patch is applied to mainline ASAP.
>
> Thanks
> Chanho Min
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Bart Van Assche [mailto:bvanassche@acm.org]
>> Sent: Friday, December 07, 2012 12:53 AM
>> To: undisclosed-recipients:
>> Cc: linux-scsi; James Bottomley; Mike Christie; Tejun Heo; Chanho Min; Jens Axboe
>> Subject: [PATCH v7 1/9] Fix race between starved list processing and device removal
>>
>> Avoid that the sdev reference count can drop to zero before
>> a queue is run by scsi_run_queue().
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
>> Reported-and-tested-by: Chanho Min <chanho.min@lge.com>
>> Reference: http://lkml.org/lkml/2012/8/2/96
>> Acked-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
>> Reviewed-by: Mike Christie <michaelc@cs.wisc.edu>
>> Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
>> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
>> ---
>> drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c | 16 +++++++++++-----
>> drivers/scsi/scsi_sysfs.c | 14 +++++++++++++-
>> 2 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
>> index f1bf5af..5c67339 100644
>> --- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
>> +++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
>> @@ -452,11 +452,17 @@ static void scsi_run_queue(struct request_queue *q)
>> continue;
>> }
>>
>> - spin_unlock(shost->host_lock);
>> - spin_lock(sdev->request_queue->queue_lock);
>> - __blk_run_queue(sdev->request_queue);
>> - spin_unlock(sdev->request_queue->queue_lock);
>> - spin_lock(shost->host_lock);
>> + /*
>> + * Obtain a reference before unlocking the host_lock such that
>> + * the sdev can't disappear before blk_run_queue() is invoked.
>> + */
>> + get_device(&sdev->sdev_gendev);
>> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(shost->host_lock, flags);
>> +
>> + blk_run_queue(sdev->request_queue);
>> + put_device(&sdev->sdev_gendev);
>> +
>> + spin_lock_irqsave(shost->host_lock, flags);
>> }
>> /* put any unprocessed entries back */
>> list_splice(&starved_list, &shost->starved_list);
>> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_sysfs.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_sysfs.c
>> index ce5224c..2ff7ba5 100644
>> --- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_sysfs.c
>> +++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_sysfs.c
>> @@ -348,7 +348,6 @@ static void scsi_device_dev_release_usercontext(struct work_struct *work)
>> starget->reap_ref++;
>> list_del(&sdev->siblings);
>> list_del(&sdev->same_target_siblings);
>> - list_del(&sdev->starved_entry);
>> spin_unlock_irqrestore(sdev->host->host_lock, flags);
>>
>> cancel_work_sync(&sdev->event_work);
>> @@ -956,6 +955,8 @@ int scsi_sysfs_add_sdev(struct scsi_device *sdev)
>> void __scsi_remove_device(struct scsi_device *sdev)
>> {
>> struct device *dev = &sdev->sdev_gendev;
>> + struct Scsi_Host *shost = sdev->host;
>> + unsigned long flags;
>>
>> if (sdev->is_visible) {
>> if (scsi_device_set_state(sdev, SDEV_CANCEL) != 0)
>> @@ -977,6 +978,17 @@ void __scsi_remove_device(struct scsi_device *sdev)
>> blk_cleanup_queue(sdev->request_queue);
>> cancel_work_sync(&sdev->requeue_work);
>>
>> + /*
>> + * Remove a SCSI device from the starved list after blk_cleanup_queue()
>> + * finished such that scsi_request_fn() can't add it back to that list.
>> + * Also remove an sdev from the starved list before invoking
>> + * put_device() such that get_device() is guaranteed to succeed for an
>> + * sdev present on the starved list.
>> + */
>> + spin_lock_irqsave(shost->host_lock, flags);
>> + list_del(&sdev->starved_entry);
>> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(shost->host_lock, flags);
>> +
>> if (sdev->host->hostt->slave_destroy)
>> sdev->host->hostt->slave_destroy(sdev);
>> transport_destroy_device(dev);
>> --
>> 1.7.10.4
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-02-09 15:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-12-06 15:51 [PATCH v7 0/9] More device removal fixes Bart Van Assche
2012-12-06 15:52 ` [PATCH v7 1/9] Fix race between starved list processing and device removal Bart Van Assche
[not found] ` <034101cdee08$2d67f870$8837e950$@min@lge.com>
2013-02-09 15:06 ` Bart Van Assche [this message]
2012-12-06 15:53 ` [PATCH v7 2/9] Remove get_device() / put_device() pair from scsi_request_fn() Bart Van Assche
2012-12-06 15:55 ` [PATCH v7 3/9] Introduce scsi_device_being_removed() Bart Van Assche
2012-12-07 6:48 ` Hannes Reinecke
2012-12-07 8:40 ` Rolf Eike Beer
2012-12-07 9:11 ` Bart Van Assche
2012-12-07 10:02 ` Rolf Eike Beer
2012-12-07 12:43 ` Bart Van Assche
2012-12-07 13:41 ` Rolf Eike Beer
2012-12-06 15:55 ` [PATCH v7 4/9] Remove offline devices when removing a host Bart Van Assche
2012-12-07 15:10 ` Hannes Reinecke
2012-12-07 15:33 ` Bart Van Assche
2012-12-07 17:21 ` Bart Van Assche
2012-12-06 15:56 ` [PATCH v7 5/9] Disallow changing the device state via sysfs into "deleted" Bart Van Assche
2012-12-07 6:55 ` Hannes Reinecke
2012-12-07 12:46 ` Bart Van Assche
2012-12-07 13:33 ` Bart Van Assche
2012-12-07 13:36 ` Hannes Reinecke
2012-12-06 15:57 ` [PATCH v7 6/9] Avoid saving/restoring interrupt state inside scsi_remove_host() Bart Van Assche
2012-12-07 6:55 ` Hannes Reinecke
2012-12-06 15:58 ` [PATCH v7 7/9] Make scsi_remove_host() wait for device removal Bart Van Assche
2012-12-06 15:59 ` [PATCH v7 8/9] Make scsi_remove_host() wait until error handling finished Bart Van Assche
2012-12-07 6:58 ` Hannes Reinecke
2012-12-06 16:00 ` [PATCH v7 9/9] Avoid that scsi_device_set_state() triggers a race Bart Van Assche
2012-12-07 6:59 ` Hannes Reinecke
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=511665FF.8090408@acm.org \
--to=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=chanho.min@lge.com \
--cc=jbottomley@parallels.com \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).