linux-scsi.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
To: linux-scsi <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: James Bottomley <jbottomley@parallels.com>,
	Mike Christie <michaelc@cs.wisc.edu>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
	Chanho Min <chanho.min@lge.com>,
	David Milburn <dmilburn@redhat.com>,
	Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
Subject: [PATCH v10 2/9] Remove get_device() / put_device() pair from scsi_request_fn()
Date: Sun, 07 Apr 2013 16:58:40 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <516189A0.6000504@acm.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <516188E5.1040008@acm.org>

Now that all scsi_request_fn() callers hold a reference on the
SCSI device that function is invoked for and since
blk_cleanup_queue() waits until scsi_request_fn() has finished
it is safe to remove the get_device() / put_device() pair from
scsi_request_fn().

Signed-off-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
Acked-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: James Bottomley <JBottomley@Parallels.com>
Cc: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
Cc: Mike Christie <michaelc@cs.wisc.edu>
---
 drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c |   14 +++-----------
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
index 8bf0f7e..d84cbd0 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
@@ -1534,16 +1534,14 @@ static void scsi_softirq_done(struct request *rq)
  * Lock status: IO request lock assumed to be held when called.
  */
 static void scsi_request_fn(struct request_queue *q)
+	__releases(q->queue_lock)
+	__acquires(q->queue_lock)
 {
 	struct scsi_device *sdev = q->queuedata;
 	struct Scsi_Host *shost;
 	struct scsi_cmnd *cmd;
 	struct request *req;
 
-	if(!get_device(&sdev->sdev_gendev))
-		/* We must be tearing the block queue down already */
-		return;
-
 	/*
 	 * To start with, we keep looping until the queue is empty, or until
 	 * the host is no longer able to accept any more requests.
@@ -1632,7 +1630,7 @@ static void scsi_request_fn(struct request_queue *q)
 			goto out_delay;
 	}
 
-	goto out;
+	return;
 
  not_ready:
 	spin_unlock_irq(shost->host_lock);
@@ -1651,12 +1649,6 @@ static void scsi_request_fn(struct request_queue *q)
 out_delay:
 	if (sdev->device_busy == 0)
 		blk_delay_queue(q, SCSI_QUEUE_DELAY);
-out:
-	/* must be careful here...if we trigger the ->remove() function
-	 * we cannot be holding the q lock */
-	spin_unlock_irq(q->queue_lock);
-	put_device(&sdev->sdev_gendev);
-	spin_lock_irq(q->queue_lock);
 }
 
 u64 scsi_calculate_bounce_limit(struct Scsi_Host *shost)
-- 
1.7.10.4


  parent reply	other threads:[~2013-04-07 14:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-04-07 14:55 [PATCH v10 0/9] More device removal fixes Bart Van Assche
2013-04-07 14:57 ` [PATCH v10 1/9] Fix race between starved list processing and device removal Bart Van Assche
2013-04-07 14:58 ` Bart Van Assche [this message]
2013-04-07 14:59 ` [PATCH v10 3/9] Avoid calling __scsi_remove_device() twice Bart Van Assche
2013-04-07 15:00 ` [PATCH v10 4/9] Disallow changing the device state via sysfs into "deleted" Bart Van Assche
2013-04-07 15:01 ` [PATCH v10 5/9] Avoid saving/restoring interrupt state inside scsi_remove_host() Bart Van Assche
2013-04-07 15:02 ` [PATCH v10 6/9] Make scsi_remove_host() wait until error handling finished Bart Van Assche
2013-04-07 15:03 ` [PATCH v10 7/9] Avoid that scsi_device_set_state() triggers a race Bart Van Assche
2013-04-07 15:04 ` [PATCH v10 8/9] Save and restore host_scribble during error handling Bart Van Assche
2013-04-07 15:05 ` [PATCH v10 9/9] Avoid reenabling I/O after the transport became offline Bart Van Assche
2013-05-08 13:58 ` [PATCH v10 0/9] More device removal fixes Joe Lawrence

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=516189A0.6000504@acm.org \
    --to=bvanassche@acm.org \
    --cc=chanho.min@lge.com \
    --cc=dmilburn@redhat.com \
    --cc=hare@suse.de \
    --cc=jbottomley@parallels.com \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=michaelc@cs.wisc.edu \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).