From: "Bryn M. Reeves" <bmr@redhat.com>
To: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com>
Cc: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>,
	dm-devel@redhat.com, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, hare@suse.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] dm mpath: attach scsi_dh during table resume
Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2013 16:27:35 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <51794B67.2000903@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.1304251037320.18633@file.rdu.redhat.com>
On 04/25/2013 03:50 PM, Mikulas Patocka wrote:
> On Thu, 25 Apr 2013, Mike Snitzer wrote:
>> The handler that is automatically attached _should_ be the correct
>> handler.  We now have the .match() hook for scsi_dh and it has made for
>> reliable scsi_dh attachment of the correct handler.
>
> The EMC devices work with both ALUA and EMC handlers - so there is no one
> "correct" handler, the correct handler is the one that the user specified
> in multipath configuration.
I think it's more absolute than that; if a Clariion array is in failover 
mode 4 (ALUA) then it's incorrect to use scsi_dh_emc and vice-versa.
The user can configure this in multipath.conf but it does not make it 
correct. The correct handler is the one that matches the configured 
failover mode of the array.
The ALUA handler scsi_device_tgps() in its match function but since the 
scsi_dh_emc match function only looks at the vendor/product it's 
impossible for it to make the correct decision.
The array can tell us what mode it's running in - teaching scsi_dh_emc 
to do this would seem to be an improvement.
Regards,
Bryn.
next prev parent reply	other threads:[~2013-04-25 15:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20130404131631.GA10208@redhat.com>
2013-04-08 21:50 ` [PATCH 1/2] [SCSI] scsi_dh: add scsi_dh_alloc_data Mike Snitzer
2013-04-08 21:50   ` [PATCH 2/2] dm mpath: attach scsi_dh during table resume Mike Snitzer
2013-04-22 22:33     ` Mike Snitzer
2013-04-25 13:48       ` Mikulas Patocka
2013-04-25 14:17         ` Mike Snitzer
2013-04-25 14:50           ` Mikulas Patocka
2013-04-25 15:27             ` Bryn M. Reeves [this message]
2013-04-25 15:37               ` Mike Snitzer
2013-04-25 15:44                 ` Bryn M. Reeves
2013-04-25 15:31             ` Mike Snitzer
2013-04-26  6:05               ` Hannes Reinecke
2013-04-26 13:29                 ` Mike Snitzer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox
  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):
  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=51794B67.2000903@redhat.com \
    --to=bmr@redhat.com \
    --cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
    --cc=hare@suse.de \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mpatocka@redhat.com \
    --cc=snitzer@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY
  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
  Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
  before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).